ADR Plan: Task Analysis → Architecture Decision Record

SkillProductivity

Analyze a task and produce an Architecture Decision Record with implementation steps.

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the ADR Plan: Task Analysis → Architecture Decision Record skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by nikiforovall/claude-code-rules in plugins/handbook-team-stack/skills/adr-plan/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

Analyze a task, explore the codebase, and produce an ADR with concrete implementation steps.

Phase 1: Analyze

  1. Read the task description, active plan, or task list
  2. Explore affected areas of the codebase — do it concurrently for independent modules
  3. Map blast radius — search for consumers of functions/types/routes being changed
  4. Identify alternatives worth considering (at least 2)

Do this silently.

Phase 2: Detect ADR Setup

Check if the project has an ADR directory:

ls docs/adr/ || ls adr/ || ls doc/adr/
  • Found → use existing directory, detect next number from existing files
  • Not found → run npx adr init en, then proceed

Phase 3: Produce ADR Content

Write the ADR using npx adr new "<title>", then edit the generated file with the following structure:

# ADR-NNNN: [Title]

## Status
Proposed

## Context
[What problem are we solving? What constraints exist?]

## Decision
[What we chose and why]

## Alternatives Considered
| Option | Pros | Cons |
|--------|------|------|
| ... | ... | ... |

## Implementation Steps

### Step 1: [Description]
- **Files:** [files to create/modify]
- **Depends on:** [previous step or "none"]
- **Done when:** [concrete acceptance criteria]

### Step 2: [Description]
...

## Consequences
- [Positive and negative outcomes, tradeoffs accepted]

Guidelines

  • Steps are ordered by dependency — each step lists what it depends on
  • Steps are parallelizable when independent — note which steps can run concurrently
  • Each step has concrete "done when" criteria — no vague outcomes
  • Alternatives table is honest — include the option you chose and why others lost
  • Keep it short. 1-2 pages max. No padding.

Phase 4: Present to User

Show the ADR content and the file path. The user may:

  • Approve → ADR stays as-is
  • Adjust → edit and re-present
  • Cancel → delete the file

Important

  • The ADR is a planning artifact, not documentation for posterity
  • Steps should map naturally to work units (a team member could own one or more steps)
  • If the task is too simple for an ADR (single file, obvious fix), say so and skip
  • Do not write implementation code — this is planning only

Signals

GitHub stars
141
Forks
21
Last commit
Aug 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
adr-plan
Source
github.com/nikiforovall/claude-code-rules