Observability Patterns (Logging, Tracing, Error Handling)

SkillMonitoring & ops

This gives your AI monitoring abilities for an API: structured logging with Pino, error tracking with Sentry, and performance monitoring and alerting with Axiom. Once it is added, your AI can record logs linked together by correlation IDs, catch errors with boundaries, and watch how the API performs over time. Problems become easier to find and fix because logs, errors, and alerts point back to the same requests.

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

After adding it, ask your AI to set up logging, error tracking, and alerting for your API. A good first step is having it add correlation IDs so every request can be followed end to end.

Then ask your AI: use the Observability Patterns (Logging, Tracing, Error Handling) skill

What your AI can do with it

  • Write structured logs with Pino and tie them together with correlation IDs
  • Track errors in Sentry so failures are recorded and visible
  • Add error boundaries to keep failures contained
  • Monitor API performance with Axiom
  • Set up alerting so you hear about issues early
  • Follow a single request across its logs to diagnose problems

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by agents-inc/skills in src/skills/api-observability-axiom-pino-sentry/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

Quick Guide: Structured logging with Pino (debug/info/warn/error). Correlation IDs for request tracing. Sentry error boundaries in React. Attach user context after auth. Filter expected errors (404s). Create Axiom monitors for alerts.


<critical_requirements>

CRITICAL: Before Using This Skill

All code must follow project conventions in CLAUDE.md (kebab-case, named exports, import ordering, import type, named constants)

(You MUST include correlation ID in ALL log statements for request tracing)

(You MUST use structured logging with required fields: level, message, correlationId, timestamp)

(You MUST filter expected errors (404, validation) from Sentry to avoid quota waste)

(You MUST attach user context to Sentry AFTER authentication completes)

(You MUST use child loggers with context instead of repeating fields in every log call)

</critical_requirements>


Auto-detection: log, logger, pino, Sentry, error boundary, correlation ID, trace, span, observability, monitoring, alerting

When to use:

  • Adding logging to new feature code
  • Implementing error handling patterns
  • Setting up request tracing with correlation IDs
  • Creating custom traces and spans for performance debugging
  • Configuring Sentry error boundaries in React components
  • Creating Axiom monitors and alerts

When NOT to use:

  • Initial project setup and dependency installation (one-time setup; follow official docs)
  • Framework-specific configuration files (follow framework SDK docs)

Key patterns covered:

  • Log levels decision tree (when to use debug/info/warn/error)
  • Structured logging with required fields
  • Correlation IDs: generating, propagating, attaching to logs
  • Custom traces/spans with OpenTelemetry
  • Sentry error boundaries in React
  • Attaching user context to Sentry after auth
  • Creating Axiom monitors and alerts
  • Filtering noise (expected errors like 404s)
  • Performance monitoring patterns
  • Debugging guide: tracing a request through the system

Detailed Resources:

Extended Examples:


Philosophy

Good observability answers three questions:

  1. What happened? (Structured logs with context)
  2. Why did it happen? (Error tracking with stack traces)
  3. How do I find it? (Correlation IDs linking related events)

Logging should be intentional, not defensive. Every log statement should answer a specific question you might ask when debugging. Avoid logging "just in case" - it creates noise that makes real issues harder to find.


Core Patterns

Pattern 1: Log Levels Decision Tree

Choose the appropriate log level based on the situation.

What are you logging?
├─ Development-only debugging info?
│   └─ debug (filtered in production)
├─ Normal operation events?
│   ├─ Request started/completed → info
│   ├─ User action completed → info
│   └─ Background job finished → info
├─ Something unexpected but recoverable?
│   ├─ Retry attempt → warn
│   ├─ Fallback used → warn
│   └─ Deprecation notice → warn
└─ Something that needs attention?
    ├─ Unhandled exception → error
    ├─ External service failure → error
    └─ Data integrity issue → error

Level Guidelines:

LevelProductionWhen to Use
debugFilteredDevelopment debugging, verbose tracing
infoVisibleNormal operations, request lifecycle, user actions
warnVisibleRecoverable issues, retries, fallbacks
errorVisible + AlertUnrecoverable issues, failures, exceptions

For code examples, see examples/core.md.


Pattern 2: Structured Logging with Required Fields

Every log statement should include structured context for searchability.

Required Fields:

FieldTypePurpose
correlationIdstringLinks all logs from same request
servicestringIdentifies the service (api, web, worker)
operationstringWhat action is being performed
userIdstring?User performing the action (if authenticated)
durationnumber?Time taken in milliseconds (for completed operations)

For code examples, see examples/core.md.


Pattern 3: Correlation IDs for Request Tracing

Generate and propagate correlation IDs to trace requests across services.

Key Components:

  1. Correlation ID Middleware - Generates/extracts correlation ID from headers
  2. Request Logger Middleware - Creates request-scoped logger with correlation context
  3. Route Handler Usage - Child loggers inherit correlation ID automatically

Modern Alternative: AsyncLocalStorage + Mixin

For larger applications, use AsyncLocalStorage with Pino's mixin option for automatic context injection without manual child logger creation in every handler.

For implementation examples of both approaches, see examples/correlation-ids.md.


Pattern 4: Custom Traces and Spans with OpenTelemetry

Add custom instrumentation for performance debugging.

Key Utilities:

  • withSpan() - Wrap async operations in traced spans
  • createSpan() - Create simple spans for synchronous operations

For code examples, see examples/tracing.md.


Pattern 5: Sentry Error Boundaries in React

Catch and report React component errors with recovery capability.

Key Components:

  1. ErrorBoundary - Class component for catching render errors
  2. global-error.tsx - SSR framework global error handler
  3. Feature-level boundaries - Wrap feature sections with custom fallbacks

For implementation examples, see examples/error-boundaries.md.


Pattern 6: Attaching User Context to Sentry

Add user information to Sentry after authentication for better debugging.

Key Functions:

  • setSentryUser() - Call after successful authentication
  • clearSentryUser() - Call on logout
  • setSentryContext() - Add additional context per-feature

For code examples, see examples/sentry-config.md.


Pattern 7: Filtering Expected Errors

Prevent expected errors from polluting Sentry quota and alerts.

Filtering Strategies:

  1. beforeSend hook - Filter by error message patterns
  2. HTTP status filtering - Skip 404, 401, 403
  3. beforeBreadcrumb hook - Remove noisy console.log breadcrumbs

For configuration examples, see examples/sentry-config.md.


Pattern 8: Creating Axiom Monitors and Alerts

Set up proactive monitoring for production issues.

Monitor Types:

  1. Error Rate Monitor - Alert when error rate > 1%
  2. Latency Monitor - Alert when P95 > 2 seconds
  3. Specific Error Monitor - Alert on database connection errors

For APL query examples, see examples/axiom.md.


Pattern 9: Performance Monitoring Patterns

Track and optimize slow operations.

Tracking Utilities:

  • trackedQuery() - Wrap database queries with performance tracking
  • trackedApiCall() - Wrap external API calls with performance tracking

For implementation examples, see examples/performance.md.


Pattern 10: Debugging Guide - Tracing a Request

How to trace a request through the system when debugging.

Steps:

  1. Get correlation ID from response headers, Sentry, or user report
  2. Search Axiom for all logs with that correlation ID
  3. Analyze request flow with timeline view
  4. Find related errors and stack traces
  5. Check Sentry for additional context

For detailed APL queries and checklist, see examples/axiom.md.


<red_flags>

RED FLAGS

For comprehensive anti-patterns and red flags, see reference.md.

Quick Reference - High Priority Issues:

  • Missing correlation ID in logs - Impossible to trace requests
  • Using console.log instead of structured logger - Not searchable, no levels
  • Logging sensitive data - Security vulnerability
  • Not filtering expected errors in Sentry - Wastes quota, buries real issues
  • Error logs without stack traces - Can't debug without knowing where error occurred

</red_flags>


<critical_reminders>

CRITICAL REMINDERS

All code must follow project conventions in CLAUDE.md

(You MUST include correlation ID in ALL log statements for request tracing)

(You MUST use structured logging with required fields: level, message, correlationId, timestamp)

(You MUST filter expected errors (404, validation) from Sentry to avoid quota waste)

(You MUST attach user context to Sentry AFTER authentication completes)

(You MUST use child loggers with context instead of repeating fields in every log call)

Failure to follow these rules will result in untraceable requests, wasted Sentry quota, and impossible debugging.

</critical_reminders>

Signals

GitHub stars
24
Forks
8
Last commit
Sep 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
api-observability-axiom-pino-sentry
Source
github.com/agents-inc/skills