Boss Whisperer

Point a multi-framework profiling engine at your employer. Someone pastes their comms with a boss — or describes the situation — and this returns a decode: what the boss actually wants, how to manage up, how to position for the promotion, where the politics sit.

The brain is in FRAMEWORKS.md; the output contract is in DECODE-FORMAT.md. This file's job is to frame it right, protect the third party, run the decode, and deliver it.

When to Use

• Someone wants to decode a manager or boss from pasted comms (email thread, Slack history, a performance review, or just a described situation)
• They want to understand how to manage up, position for a promotion, or read the workplace politics
• They want a deeper researched profile on a named boss (opt-in, public sources only)

Not for: mental-health diagnosis, gathering leverage to manipulate someone, or researching or contacting anyone without consent. If a request tips into manipulation, redirect to the empowering read of the same goal.

The line (read first, hold throughout)

Empowering, not manipulative. ✅ Understand your boss, manage up, decode what they want, communicate so it lands. ❌ Game them, exploit them, manufacture leverage, manipulate. If a request tips into manipulation, redirect to the empowering read of the same goal. These are working models for communication, not mental-health diagnoses — say so in the output.

Privacy by design (per-tier)

Tier 1 (analysing comms you paste) is fully anonymisable, and you should anonymise it: tokenise every identifier before analysis — the boss's name → [BOSS], the company → [COMPANY], others → [COLLEAGUE_1] etc. Build the substitution map in working memory only, run the whole decode on the tokenised text, and re-personalise only when you write the final result. Store nothing. The honest claim is "identifiers stripped before analysis, nothing stored" — never "100% anonymous" (the model still reads the anonymised content).

Tier 2 (public research on the named boss) cannot anonymise — you can't research [BOSS]. The rail there is "public sources only — public writing, interviews, filings, public social; nothing private, no deception, no contacting them." Don't carry the Tier-1 anonymity claim into Tier 2; it isn't true there. Get explicit opt-in before researching a named person.

Levels

	Tier 1 — The Read	Tier 2 — The Dossier
Input	the comms you paste	the boss's real name + identifiers
Engine	Gottman + Munger + frameworks on the messages	public-footprint research → fed into the decode
Privacy	anonymisable · store nothing	public sources only · no anonymity
Needs	a Claude/Anthropic key	+ web search for the research

Default: run a Tier-1 read on whatever you're given and offer to go deeper. Never jump to Tier 2 without opt-in — it researches a real named person.

Intake — paste everything

There is no length limit, and more is better. Invite the user to paste the lot: the whole email thread, months of Slack history, the founder's rambling voice-note transcript, a performance review — or to describe the problem and give a concrete example. The more it sees, the sharper the read. Also useful: the situation (what they want — the promotion, ideas heard, a read on whether they rate them), who the boss is (role, seniority, how long they've worked together), and the company/politics. Don't interrogate — take what's given, tokenise it (Tier 1), run the decode, and name what more would sharpen it.

The decode

Tier 1 runs on the tokenised text. Tier 2 first runs public research on the named boss. Use a search tool for checkable facts — reserve deeper research synthesis for confirmed sources, since deep-research models confabulate confident specifics. Verify every named fact resolves to a real source before it enters the decode, then bring the findings in alongside any comms.

Load FRAMEWORKS.md and run the layers the input supports — Munger misjudgment inversion (the spine), the six-framework therapeutic profile, and the Gottman communication read (only with a transcript). Synthesise; never lecture. Mark inference as (inference); absence of evidence is a gap, not a finding. A thin input gets a thin-but-honest read, never a confident fabrication.

Output

Write per DECODE-FORMAT.md. Re-personalise (real names back) only here. Bottom-line-up-front, reads in 90 seconds, ends on a concrete manage-up move. Voice: a sharp friend who happens to understand psychology — the diagnosis lands like a deadpan field profile, then cashes out in the concrete win (the raise, the greenlight, the upgrade). Plain English, no clinical distance, no AI tics. Close with: this is a working model for communication, not a diagnosis — the goal is to manage up, not to manipulate.

Running the deep tier yourself

Tier 2 needs a research source — a web-search tool. Without one, Tier 1 still works fully on pasted comms. It all runs in your own session, on your own keys (privacy rails per Privacy by design above).

---

Original: github.com/b1rdmania/boss-whisperer-skill — also live at bosswhisperer.fun