CC Review
SkillSecurityStructured code review workflow, intended for explicit quick/full/security reviews; not responsible for general implementation or bug-fixing workflows.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the CC Review skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by doccker/cc-use-exp in .codex/skills/cc-review/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
当用户明确要求 review、quick review 或 security review 时,使用本技能。
不要用于:
- 普通编码实现
- 直接 bug 修复
- 语言细节规范
- 环境级风险判断
审查模式
用户可以指定审查目标:
- 审查当前分支:
$cc-review、$cc-review quick、$cc-review security - 审查指定提交:
$cc-review <commit-hash>、$cc-review quick <commit-hash>、$cc-review security <commit-hash>
参数解析规则:
- 优先匹配模式关键字(quick/security/full)
- 其他参数视为 commit hash
- 参数顺序灵活(
$cc-review quick abc123或$cc-review abc123 quick均可)
Quick Review
面向当前 diff 或指定提交,快速给出高价值反馈。
Git 命令:
- 当前分支:
git diff --stat+git diff - 指定提交:
git show --stat <commit>+git show <commit>
Full Review
围绕受影响调用链、输入输出契约和回归面做更完整的审查。
Git 命令:
- 当前分支:
git diff --merge-base origin/HEAD - 指定提交:
git show <commit>
Security Review
重点检查认证授权、输入校验、命令执行、数据暴露和权限边界。
Git 命令:
- 当前分支:
git diff --merge-base origin/HEAD - 指定提交:
git show <commit>
默认优先级
- 错误行为和明显 bug
- 回归风险
- 缺失校验或错误处理
- 安全问题
- 缺失或薄弱测试
- 可维护性问题
Commit Hash 验证
当用户指定 commit hash 时,必须先验证其有效性:
# 验证 commit 是否存在
if ! git rev-parse --verify "$TARGET^{commit}" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
echo "❌ 错误:无效的 commit hash: $TARGET"
echo ""
echo "请检查:"
echo "1. commit hash 是否正确(可以是完整 hash 或短 hash)"
echo "2. commit 是否存在于当前仓库"
echo ""
echo "提示:使用 'git log' 查看可用的 commit"
exit 1
fi
# 获取完整 hash 和提交信息
FULL_HASH=$(git rev-parse "$TARGET")
COMMIT_MSG=$(git log -1 --pretty=format:"%s" "$TARGET")
审查报告开头应包含审查范围信息:
### 审查范围
**提交**: `<full-hash>`
**信息**: <commit-message>
**作者**: <author-name> <<author-email>>
**时间**: <commit-date>
输出要求
- 默认使用简体中文输出;只有用户明确要求英文或需要保留外部英文材料时才切换。
- 标题、严重度和结论使用中文命名,例如“发现的问题”“待确认问题”“残余风险”“总结”“高/中/低”。
- findings 优先,按严重度排序。
- 尽量带精确文件引用。
- 总结保持简短,放在 findings 之后。
- 若没有发现问题,要明确写出“未发现明确问题”,并说明残余风险或验证盲区。
- 建议项必须打分类标签(✅本轮修复 / 📝技术债 / ❌拒绝),禁用「留给下次迭代」等悬空话术,详见
references/quick-review.md与references/full-review.md。
按需展开
- 审查优先级:
references/review-priority.md - Quick Review:
references/quick-review.md - Full Review:
references/full-review.md - Security Review:
references/security-review.md
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 1k
- Forks
- 112
- Last commit
- Aug 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
cc-review- Source
- github.com/doccker/cc-use-exp