Chai-1 Structure Prediction

Plain-language role: Use Chai when you want a modern structure-prediction model for validating designed binders or complexes.

Prerequisites

Requirement	Minimum	Recommended
Python	3.10+	3.11
CUDA	12.0+	12.1+
GPU VRAM	24GB	40GB (A100)
RAM	32GB	64GB

How to run

First time? See Installation Guide to set up Modal and biomodals.

Option 1: Modal

cd biomodals
modal run modal_chai1.py \
  --input-faa complex.fasta \
  --out-dir predictions/

GPU: A100 (40GB) | Timeout: 30min default

Option 2: Chai API (recommended)

pip install chai_lab

python -c "
import chai_lab
from chai_lab.chai1 import run_inference

# Run prediction
run_inference(
    fasta_file='complex.fasta',
    output_dir='predictions/',
    num_trunk_recycles=3
)
"

Option 3: Local installation

git clone https://github.com/chaidiscovery/chai1-structure-prediction-lab.git
cd chai1-structure-prediction-lab
pip install -e .

chai1-structure-prediction-lab predict \
  --fasta complex.fasta \
  --output predictions/

FASTA Format

Protein complex

>binder
MKTAYIAKQRQISFVKSHFSRQLE...
>target
MVLSPADKTNVKAAWGKVGAHAGE...

Protein + ligand

>protein
MKTAYIAKQRQISFVKSHFSRQLE...
>ligand|smiles
CCO

Protein + DNA/RNA

>protein
MKTAYIAKQRQISFVKSHFSRQLE...
>dna
ATCGATCGATCG

Key parameters

Parameter	Default	Range	Description
num_trunk_recycles	3	1-10	Recycles (more = better)
num_diffn_timesteps	200	50-500	Diffusion steps
seed	0	int	Random seed

Output format

predictions/
├── pred.model_idx_0.cif    # Best model (CIF format)
├── pred.model_idx_1.cif    # Second model
├── scores.json             # Confidence scores
├── pae.npy                 # PAE matrix
└── plddt.npy               # pLDDT values

Note: Chai-1 outputs CIF format. Convert to PDB if needed:

from Bio.PDB import MMCIFParser, PDBIO
parser = MMCIFParser()
structure = parser.get_structure("pred", "pred.model_idx_0.cif")
io = PDBIO()
io.set_structure(structure)
io.save("pred.model_idx_0.pdb")

Extracting metrics

import numpy as np
import json

# Load scores
with open('predictions/scores.json') as f:
    scores = json.load(f)

plddt = np.load('predictions/plddt.npy')
pae = np.load('predictions/pae.npy')

print(f"pLDDT: {plddt.mean():.3f}")
print(f"pTM: {scores['ptm']:.3f}")
print(f"ipTM: {scores.get('iptm', 'N/A')}")

Use cases

Binder validation

# Predict complex with Chai
chai1-structure-prediction-lab predict --fasta binder_target.fasta --output val/

# Check ipTM > 0.5
scores = json.load(open('val/scores.json'))
if scores['iptm'] > 0.5:
    print("Design passes validation")

Protein-ligand complex

# FASTA with SMILES
fasta = """
>protein
MKTA...
>ligand|smiles
CCO
"""

# Chai handles both protein and small molecules

Batch prediction

# Multiple sequences
for fasta in sequences/*.fasta; do
    chai1-structure-prediction-lab predict \
        --fasta "$fasta" \
        --output "predictions/$(basename $fasta .fasta)"
done

Comparison with AF2

Aspect	Chai-1	AlphaFold2
MSA required	No	Yes
Small molecules	Yes	No
DNA/RNA	Yes	Limited
Speed	Faster	Slower
Accuracy	Comparable	Reference

Sample output

Successful run

$ chai1-structure-prediction-lab predict --fasta complex.fasta --output predictions/
[INFO] Loading Chai-1 model...
[INFO] Running inference...
[INFO] Saved 5 models to predictions/

predictions/scores.json:
{
  "ptm": 0.82,
  "iptm": 0.71,
  "ranking_score": 0.76
}

What good output looks like:

• pTM: > 0.7 (confident global structure)
• ipTM: > 0.5 (confident interface, > 0.7 for high confidence)
• CIF files with reasonable atom positions

Decision tree

Should I use Chai?
│
├─ What are you predicting?
│  ├─ Protein-protein complex → Chai ✓ or ColabFold
│  ├─ Protein + small molecule → Chai ✓
│  ├─ Protein + DNA/RNA → Chai ✓
│  └─ Single protein only → Use ESMFold (faster)
│
├─ Need MSA?
│  ├─ No / want speed → Chai ✓
│  └─ Yes / want accuracy → ColabFold
│
└─ Priority?
   ├─ Highest accuracy → ColabFold with MSA
   ├─ Speed / no MSA → Chai ✓
   └─ Ligand binding → Chai ✓

Typical performance

Campaign Size	Time (A100)	Cost (Modal)	Notes
100 complexes	30-60 min	~$10	Standard validation
500 complexes	2-4h	~$45	Large campaign
1000 complexes	5-8h	~$90	Comprehensive

Per-complex: ~20-40s for typical binder-target complex.

---

Verify

find predictions -name "*.cif" | wc -l  # Should match input count

---

Troubleshooting

Low pLDDT: Increase num_trunk_recycles Low ipTM: Check chain order, interface region OOM errors: Use A100-80GB or reduce batch Slow prediction: Reduce num_diffn_timesteps

Error interpretation

Error	Cause	Fix
RuntimeError: CUDA out of memory	Complex too large	Use A100-80GB or split prediction
KeyError: 'iptm'	Single chain predicted	Ensure FASTA has multiple chains
ValueError: invalid SMILES	Malformed ligand	Validate SMILES with RDKit
torch.cuda.OutOfMemoryError	GPU exhausted	Reduce num_diffn_timesteps to 100

---

Next: protein-design-qc for filtering and ranking.

Inputs

• Protein sequences or complexes in FASTA format, optionally with ligand or molecular context.
• Prediction parameters such as diffusion steps, seeds, and output directory.
• A GPU or API-backed runtime configured for Chai inference.

Outputs

• Predicted structures and accompanying confidence metrics for each input sequence or complex.
• Model artifacts suitable for extracting pLDDT, ipTM, PAE, and ranking metadata.
• A validation set that can flow directly into protein-design-qc and ipsae.

Next Step

Run protein-design-qc on the prediction outputs, then use ipsae if you need binder-focused ranking.