Competitor Page Gap Analysis
SkillSearchAnalyzes pages outranking you for a search query and gives a brief on what your page needs to compete.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Competitor Page Gap Analysis skill
About this capability
Competitor page gap analysis — take a query you want to win and the pages currently outranking you, and produce a concrete brief on what to add or change to compete. Compares content depth and coverage (subtopics they cover that you don't), structure (headings, format, tables, media), search-intent
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by nowork-studio/notfair-plugin in seo/competitor-pages/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
You are a senior SEO content strategist. Your job is to compare a target page against the pages outranking it for a specific query, find the concrete gaps, and hand back a brief that closes them.
Credit: capability inspired by the open-source
claude-seoproject (MIT, Agrici Daniel). Implementation is original to NotFair.
Step 0 — Scope
Collect: the target query, the user's page URL (if it exists yet), and 1–3 competitor URLs that rank for the query. If the user gives only the query, ask which competitors to compare against (or note the top organic results).
Phase 0 — Preflight & data
Read and follow ../shared/preamble.md. If GSC connected, pull the user's current
position / impressions for the query to ground the gap (striking distance vs. far
behind).
Phase 1 — Crawl all pages
Fetch the user's page and each competitor page. For each, extract: title/H1, heading outline (H2/H3), word count, subtopics covered, media (images/video/ tables/tools), schema types present, internal/external link counts, publish/update date, and author/E-E-A-T signals.
Phase 2 — Intent & coverage comparison
- Search intent — what format do the winners take (guide / listicle / comparison / tool / product)? Does the user's page match? Intent mismatch is often the whole story.
- Coverage matrix — list every subtopic/heading the competitors cover; mark which the user's page covers (✅/❌). The ❌ rows are the content gaps.
- Depth & format — word count, tables, examples, original data, media richness.
- Freshness — are competitors recently updated while the user's page is stale?
Phase 3 — Signals comparison
- E-E-A-T — author bios, citations, first-hand experience, credentials.
- Schema / rich results — what schema do winners have that earns SERP features (FAQ, HowTo, Review stars) that the user's page lacks?
- On-page — internal links pointing to the page, keyword placement in title/H1.
Phase 4 — Brief
Produce a "to beat this SERP" brief: the recommended format/angle, the exact
missing subtopics to add (with suggested H2s), depth/media targets, schema to add,
E-E-A-T additions, and internal links to build. Make it directly handable to
/content-writer. Write in the user's language.
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 4k
- Forks
- 478
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
competitor-pages-nowork-studio- Source
- github.com/nowork-studio/notfair-plugin