Context Optimizer - 上下文优化专家

SkillProductivity

Context optimization expert. Specializes in context management, token efficiency, and performance optimization in long conversations. Solves issues such as lost-in-middle and context poisoning to improve AI agent performance on complex tasks.

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the Context Optimizer - 上下文优化专家 skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by huangwb8/skills in skills/alpha/awesome-code/agents/context-optimizer/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

核心理念

上下文优化 是长对话性能的关键:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  识别问题 → 压缩历史 → 掩码加载 → 缓存重用 → 性能提升  │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

核心问题

  • Lost-in-Middle:关键信息被中间内容淹没
  • Context Poisoning:冲突信息干扰判断
  • Distraction:无关信息浪费 token
  • Context Clash:多信息源冲突

何时使用本技能

在以下场景时激活:

  • 长对话导致性能下降
  • Context window 接近限制
  • AI 遗忘之前的信息
  • 提到"上下文"、"token 限制"、"效率"

上下文问题识别

问题 1:Lost-in-Middle

表现

  • AI 遗忘对话中间的关键信息
  • 首尾信息记住,中间信息遗忘
  • 需要重复提供相同信息

检测

def detect_lost_in_middle(conversation: list) -> bool:
    """检测是否出现 lost-in-middle 问题"""
    # 1. 检查对话长度
    if len(conversation) < 10:
        return False

    # 2. 检查是否有重复提问
    questions = [msg for msg in conversation if '?' in msg]
    unique_questions = set(questions)
    if len(questions) > len(unique_questions) * 1.5:
        return True  # 存在重复提问

    # 3. 检查中间内容是否被引用
    middle_start = len(conversation) // 3
    middle_end = len(conversation) * 2 // 3
    middle_content = conversation[middle_start:middle_end]

    # 检查后续对话是否引用中间内容
    later_refs = sum(
        1 for msg in conversation[middle_end:]
        if any(keyword in msg for keyword in extract_keywords(middle_content))
    )

    if later_refs < len(middle_content) * 0.1:
        return True  # 中间内容被遗忘

    return False

问题 2:Context Poisoning

表现

  • AI 产生矛盾的回答
  • 错误信息影响判断
  • 不同来源信息冲突

检测

def detect_context_poisoning(conversation: list) -> list:
    """检测上下文污染"""
    conflicts = []

    # 1. 提取所有事实陈述
    facts = extract_facts(conversation)

    # 2. 检测矛盾
    for fact1, fact2 in combinations(facts, 2):
        if are_contradictory(fact1, fact2):
            conflicts.append({
                'type': 'contradiction',
                'fact1': fact1,
                'fact2': fact2,
                'severity': 'high'
            })

    # 3. 检测信息源冲突
    sources = group_by_source(facts)
    for source, source_facts in sources.items():
        if has_internal_conflicts(source_facts):
            conflicts.append({
                'type': 'source_conflict',
                'source': source,
                'severity': 'medium'
            })

    return conflicts

优化策略

策略 1:压缩策略

历史压缩
class ContextCompressor:
    """上下文压缩器"""

    def compress_history(
        self,
        conversation: list,
        max_tokens: int,
        retention_priority: list[str] = None
    ) -> list:
        """
        压缩对话历史

        Args:
            conversation: 对话历史
            max_tokens: 最大 token 数
            retention_priority: 保留优先级 ["current_task", "decisions", "errors"]

        返回值:
            压缩后的对话
        """
        priority = retention_priority or ["current_task", "decisions", "errors"]

        # 1. 分类消息
        categorized = self._categorize_messages(conversation)

        # 2. 按优先级保留
        retained = []
        current_tokens = 0

        for category in priority:
            messages = categorized.get(category, [])

            for msg in messages:
                tokens = self._count_tokens(msg)
                if current_tokens + tokens > max_tokens:
                    # 尝试压缩
                    compressed = self._compress_message(msg)
                    if current_tokens + self._count_tokens(compressed) <= max_tokens:
                        retained.append(compressed)
                        current_tokens += self._count_tokens(compressed)
                else:
                    retained.append(msg)
                    current_tokens += tokens

        return retained

    def _categorize_messages(self, conversation: list) -> dict:
        """分类消息"""
        categories = {
            'current_task': [],
            'decisions': [],
            'errors': [],
            'context': []
        }

        for msg in conversation:
            if self._is_task_related(msg):
                categories['current_task'].append(msg)
            elif self._is_decision(msg):
                categories['decisions'].append(msg)
            elif self._is_error(msg):
                categories['errors'].append(msg)
            else:
                categories['context'].append(msg)

        return categories

    def _compress_message(self, message: str) -> str:
        """压缩单条消息"""
        # 提取关键信息
        key_points = extract_key_points(message)

        # 生成摘要
        summary = summarize(key_points)

        return f"[摘要] {summary}"

    def _count_tokens(self, text: str) -> int:
        """估算 token 数量"""
        return len(text.split()) * 1.3  # 粗略估计
增量摘要
class IncrementalSummarizer:
    """增量摘要器"""

    def __init__(self, summary_interval: int = 10):
        self.summary_interval = summary_interval
        self.summaries = []

    def add_messages(self, messages: list) -> str:
        """添加消息并生成摘要"""
        # 每隔 N 条消息生成一次摘要
        if len(messages) % self.summary_interval == 0:
            summary = self._generate_summary(messages[-self.summary_interval:])
            self.summaries.append(summary)

        # 返回完整的摘要历史
        return "\n\n".join(self.summaries)

    def _generate_summary(self, messages: list) -> str:
        """生成消息摘要"""
        # 提取关键信息
        key_info = {
            'tasks': self._extract_tasks(messages),
            'decisions': self._extract_decisions(messages),
            'errors': self._extract_errors(messages),
            'outcomes': self._extract_outcomes(messages)
        }

        # 格式化摘要
        summary_parts = []
        if key_info['tasks']:
            summary_parts.append(f"任务: {', '.join(key_info['tasks'])}")
        if key_info['decisions']:
            summary_parts.append(f"决策: {', '.join(key_info['decisions'])}")
        if key_info['errors']:
            summary_parts.append(f"错误: {', '.join(key_info['errors'])}")
        if key_info['outcomes']:
            summary_parts.append(f"结果: {', '.join(key_info['outcomes'])}")

        return " | ".join(summary_parts)

策略 2:掩码策略

按需加载
class LazyContextLoader:
    """懒加载上下文"""

    def __init__(self):
        self.loaded_references = {}
        self.reference_metadata = {}

    def load_reference(
        self,
        ref_name: str,
        force: bool = False
    ) -> str | None:
        """
        按需加载参考文档

        Args:
            ref_name: 参考文档名称
            force: 是否强制重新加载
        """
        # 已加载且不强制
        if ref_name in self.loaded_references and not force:
            return self.loaded_references[ref_name]

        # 检查元数据
        metadata = self.reference_metadata.get(ref_name)
        if not metadata:
            return None

        # 按需决策
        if self._should_load(metadata):
            content = self._load_from_disk(ref_name)
            self.loaded_references[ref_name] = content
            return content

        return None

    def _should_load(self, metadata: dict) -> bool:
        """判断是否应该加载"""
        # 判断逻辑:
        # 1. 是否被明确请求
        # 2. 相关性分数
        # 3. 当前 token 使用率

        relevance = metadata.get('relevance', 0)
        token_usage = metadata.get('token_usage', 0)

        return relevance > 0.7 or token_usage < 0.8

策略 3:缓存策略

智能缓存
class SmartCache:
    """智能缓存系统"""

    def __init__(self, max_size: int = 100):
        self.cache = {}
        self.max_size = max_size
        self.access_count = {}

    def get(self, key: str) -> any:
        """获取缓存"""
        if key in self.cache:
            # 更新访问计数
            self.access_count[key] = self.access_count.get(key, 0) + 1
            return self.cache[key]
        return None

    def set(self, key: str, value: any, priority: int = 1):
        """设置缓存"""
        # 缓存已满,清理低优先级项
        if len(self.cache) >= self.max_size:
            self._evict_low_priority()

        self.cache[key] = value
        self.access_count[key] = 0

    def _evict_low_priority(self):
        """淘汰低优先级缓存"""
        # 按 (访问次数 * 优先级) 排序
        items = list(self.cache.items())
        items.sort(key=lambda x: self.access_count.get(x[0], 0) * x[1].get('priority', 1))

        # 移除最低分项
        if items:
            key_to_remove = items[0][0]
            del self.cache[key_to_remove]
            del self.access_count[key_to_remove]

# 使用示例
cache = SmartCache()

# 缓存解析结果
code_structure = parse_code('main.py')
cache.set('code:main.py', code_structure, priority=2)

# 获取缓存
cached = cache.get('code:main.py')
if cached:
    use_cached_structure(cached)

优化检查清单

问题诊断

  • 对话长度是否合理
  • 是否有重复提问
  • 中间信息是否被遗忘
  • 是否存在信息冲突

压缩策略

  • 历史对话已摘要
  • 关键决策已保留
  • 错误信息已保留
  • 无关信息已过滤

掩码策略

  • 参考文档按需加载
  • 详细信息延迟加载
  • 避免一次性加载所有内容

缓存策略

  • 解析结果已缓存
  • 频繁访问内容已缓存
  • 缓存有淘汰机制

最佳实践

1. 分阶段处理

# ❌ 一次性处理所有信息
def process_large_file(filename):
    content = read_file(filename)  # 可能很大
    result = analyze(content)
    return result

# ✅ 分阶段处理
def process_large_file(filename):
    # 第一阶段:获取结构
    structure = get_file_structure(filename)

    # 第二阶段:按需加载
    for section in structure.sections:
        content = load_section(filename, section)
        result = analyze_section(content)

    return aggregate_results(results)

2. 渐进式信息披露

# ❌ 一次性提供所有信息
def provide_context():
    return """
    这是项目的完整文档,包括架构、API、配置等...
    (可能 10000+ tokens)
    """

# ✅ 渐进式披露
def provide_context():
    return """
    项目概述:这是一个 Web 应用

    需要详细信息时,可查阅:
    - [架构设计](docs/architecture.md)
    - [API 文档](docs/api.md)
    - [配置指南](docs/config.md)

    (约 100 tokens)
    """

相关参考

约束

公共硬约束

本块由 docs/templates/skill-common-constraints.md 统一维护;每个 SKILL.md## 约束 必须逐字同步本块,不得在副本中改写公共规则。

  • 任务需要落盘时,使用唯一的 ./.bensz-api/task-{yyyymmdd-hhmm}-{简短描述}/ 根目录;共享材料放入 shared/,Skill 专属材料放入该 Skill 的 input/output/log/
  • 正式交付物、源代码和正式计划按项目约定保存,不写入任务工作区;未经授权不覆盖、删除、迁移或远程写入。
  • 项目维护变更检查 BAC 可用性并记录需求、AI 产出、工具结果、文件改动和验证摘要;BAC 只做过程审计,不替代署名、责任或合规判断。
  • 不记录 API Key、访问令牌、密码、Cookie、环境/凭据文件、私有 Prompt、身份信息、本地用户名、主机名或不必要的大体积原始数据。
  • 文件路径必须规范化并限制在授权项目范围内;外部 URL、子进程和网络访问遵循最小权限,防止路径遍历、SSRF 和命令注入。
  • Skill 版本唯一记录在自身 config.yaml:skill_info.version;公开 API、协议、目录或配置变更同步文档与 CHANGELOG.md
  • bensz-collect-bugs 是一个 Agent Skill;仅将 Bensz Agent Skill 或 Bensz 基础设施本身的设计缺陷交给它。先脱敏写入 ~/.bensz-skills/bugs/,当前任务不中断,只有用户明确要求才公开上报,禁止直接修改用户已安装的 Skill 源码。

Signals

GitHub stars
48
Forks
7
Last commit
Sep 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
context-optimizer-huangwb8
Source
github.com/huangwb8/skills