/cs:cto-review — CTO Forcing Questions

SkillAI & models

Once added, your AI can pressure-test an architecture plan with six CTO-style questions on scaling, tech debt, team growth, and build-versus-buy. It is meant for the moments when you are about to commit to an architecture, planning for a big jump in load, or weighing a rebuild against buying from a vendor.

Use /cs:cto-review — CTO Forcing Questions in Claude, ChatGPT or Ahel Desktop

Free. Sign in, add /cs:cto-review — CTO Forcing Questions and connect your AI. About a minute.

Also: Claude Code · Cursor · Codex

Then ask your AI: use the /cs:cto-review skill

Details

Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.

After adding it, share the architecture plan you want examined and ask for a cto-review. It fits best when you are committing to a design, planning for a big jump in load, or deciding between a rebuild and a vendor.

/cs:cto-review — CTO Forcing QuestionsStart free

What your AI can do with it

  • Ask six CTO-style questions about an architecture plan
  • Surface scaling risks before you commit to a design
  • Highlight tech debt a plan might be carrying
  • Test whether a plan holds up under ten times the load
  • Weigh rebuilding against buying from a vendor
  • Consider how the plan holds up as the team grows

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by alirezarezvani/claude-skills in .gemini/skills/cto-review/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

Command: /cs:cto-review <plan>

Pressure-tests architecture and engineering scaling decisions. Six questions to surface the next scaling cliff before you hit it.

When to Run

  • Before approving a major architecture change
  • Before doubling the engineering team
  • Before a build-vs-buy decision > $100K/year
  • When a system is showing reliability stress (SLOs missed)
  • Before committing to a new platform / language / DB

The Six CTO Questions

1. Scaling Cliff

Where does the current architecture break, in terms of users / requests / data volume?

  • Be specific. "It breaks at 10× current load because the primary DB writes saturate."
  • If you don't know, run a load test before deciding.

2. Tech Debt Inventory

What's the top tech debt item, what's it costing per week, and when does it become blocking?

python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/cto-advisor/scripts/tech_debt_analyzer.py

3. Team Scaling

For each open req, what's the ramp time and contribution model?

python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/cto-advisor/scripts/team_scaling_calculator.py

4. Build vs Buy

Why are we building this instead of buying it — and what's the 3-year TCO of each?

  • If "we want control" or "it's not that hard" — push back.
  • If the answer is "this is our core moat," build.

5. SLO / Reliability

What are the SLOs for this system and what's the current error budget burn?

  • Without an SLO, you can't reason about reliability tradeoffs.
  • See engineering/slo-architect for SLO design.

6. Security & Compliance Surface

What does this expose, and has cs-ciso-advisor signed off?

  • Architecture decisions are compliance decisions.
  • Loop in cs-ciso-advisor before commit.

Workflow

  1. Run the tech debt analyzer + team scaling calculator
  2. Define the scaling-cliff hypothesis explicitly
  3. Cross-check with cs-ciso-advisor for security implications
  4. Apply the verdict

Output Format

# CTO Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD

## Scaling Cliff
- Current capacity: <metric>
- Break point: <metric>
- Headroom: X months at current growth

## Tech Debt
- Top item: <description>
- Cost per week: $X or N eng-hours
- Blocking date estimate: <date>

## Team
- Open reqs: N
- Median ramp: X months
- Contribution model: <pairing / squad / area>

## Build vs Buy
- 3-year build TCO: $X
- 3-year buy TCO: $X
- Strategic fit: <core / context>
- Decision: BUILD | BUY

## Reliability
- SLO defined: yes / no
- Error budget burn: X% (target < Y%)

## Security
- cs-ciso sign-off: ✅ / ❌

## Verdict
🟢 SHIP | 🟡 SHARPEN | 🔴 BLOCK

## Next Steps
[3 concrete actions]

Routing

  • /cs:ciso-review — mandatory if data surface changes
  • /cs:cfo-review — for build-vs-buy > $100K
  • /cs:execute — quarterly plan
  • /cs:boardroom — for architecture pivots

Related


Version: 1.0.0

Signals

GitHub stars
27k
Forks
4k
Last commit
Aug 2026
Advanced
Item type
skill
Key
cto-review
Source
github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills