Debug an agent from its trace

SkillMonitoring & ops

Use this to diagnose WHY an LLM agent or chain produced a wrong, empty, slow, or expensive result, by reading its observability trace. Trigger on "my agent gave the wrong answer", "the chain returned nothing", "why is this so slow/expensive", "debug this trace/run", or when a trace tree is available. Walk the span tree systematically instead of guessing.

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the Debug an agent from its trace skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by contextjet-ai/awesome-llm-observability in skills/debug-agent-from-traces/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

A trace is a tree of spans (parent request → LLM/tool/retrieval children). Most agent failures are visible in it if you read it in the right order. Don't guess from the final output - walk the tree.

Triage by symptom

SymptomLook here first
Wrong answerThe LLM span just before the bad output: was the prompt/context correct? Then the retrieval span that fed it.
Empty / truncated outputfinish_reason (length? content_filter?), max_tokens, and any span that raised an exception then got swallowed.
Hallucinated factsRetrieval spans - were the right docs retrieved (check scores/IDs)? If not, it's a retrieval bug, not an LLM bug.
Too slowSpan durations - find the critical path. Usually one slow retrieval, a serial loop that should be parallel, or a huge context.
Too expensiveToken counts per LLM span - find the span with the largest input_tokens (usually bloated context or a retry storm).
Silent failureA span with an error/exception that was caught and returned empty. A missing subtree = a step that never ran.

The systematic walk

  1. Start at the root, confirm the user input is what you expect.
  2. Follow to the first LLM call. Read the actual rendered prompt + context (not the template). Most "model is dumb" bugs are actually "we fed it the wrong context".
  3. Check each tool/retrieval span in order: inputs correct? output sane? error?
  4. Find the divergence point - the first span where reality differs from intent. Fix there, not at the output.
  5. Check token + latency on every LLM span to catch cost/perf issues even when the answer is right.

Common root causes (in order of frequency)

  • Wrong/empty retrieved context → the LLM was set up to fail. (Retrieval bug.)
  • Prompt/template rendering bug → a variable didn't interpolate; context is blank or duplicated.
  • Swallowed exception → a try/except that logs and returns empty, dropping context or output silently. Grep for these.
  • Retry storm → the same call repeated N times (rate limit / transient error) inflating cost + latency.
  • Context bloat → the whole history re-sent each turn; input_tokens grows every step.

Turn the fix into a regression test

Once you find the divergence, capture that input as an eval case (see the add-llm-evals skill) so the bug can't come back. Debugging a trace and not adding a test means you'll debug it again next month.

Anti-patterns

  • Re-prompting the model when the real bug is upstream retrieval/rendering.
  • Reading only the final output and inferring the cause.
  • Fixing the symptom without adding a regression test.

Signals

GitHub stars
34
Forks
18
Last commit
Sep 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
debug-agent-from-traces
Source
github.com/contextjet-ai/awesome-llm-observability