Explanation Traces: Structured Decision Query
SkillAI & modelsQuery and display structured decision traces from routing, agent selection, and skill execution.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Explanation Traces: Structured Decision Query skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by notque/vexjoy-agent in skills/meta/explanation-traces/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Overview
This skill reads the per-dispatch route event log and presents routing decisions and their outcomes as a human-readable timeline. It answers "why did I get routed here?" from what was recorded at decision time — never from post-hoc reconstruction or rationalization.
The log: <CLAUDE_LEARNING_DIR>/route-events.jsonl, default ~/.claude/learning/route-events.jsonl. Append-only JSONL — one JSON object per line. Written via hooks/lib/route_events.py by two producers:
| Producer | Fires on | Appends |
|---|---|---|
hooks/routing-decision-recorder.py | PostToolUse (Agent dispatch) | One DECISION event per /do-routed dispatch |
hooks/routing-outcome-finalizer.py | UserPromptSubmit | One OUTCOME event when it finalizes a pending dispatch |
The log is auxiliary instrumentation: writes are failure-safe (worst case one lost line), and the aggregate routing rows in learning.db stay authoritative for the confidence loop.
Key constraints baked into the workflow:
- Read-only: this skill never modifies the log or any other file
- Answers must come from recorded events, not from memory or inference about what "probably happened"
- If no log exists, name the real path and the real producing hook rather than guessing at decisions
- When the user asks about a specific decision, filter to that decision — skip the full dump
ts(epoch seconds) and recorded fields are authoritative; keep their precisionrequest_snippetis private session data: show it to this session's own user, and keep it out of anything that leaves the session (PR bodies, issues, exports) — report counts there instead
Instructions
Phase 1: LOCATE
Goal: Find the route event log.
Step 1: Resolve the path and check it
LOG="${CLAUDE_LEARNING_DIR:-$HOME/.claude/learning}/route-events.jsonl"
wc -l "$LOG"
CLAUDE_LEARNING_DIR redirects the log (tests and redirected DBs use it); unset means the default ~/.claude/learning/.
Step 2: Handle missing log
If the file is absent or empty, stop and inform the user:
No route event log found at ~/.claude/learning/route-events.jsonl
(or $CLAUDE_LEARNING_DIR/route-events.jsonl when that variable is set).
The log is created on the first /do-routed dispatch by the
routing-decision-recorder hook (hooks/routing-decision-recorder.py).
An empty or missing log means no /do-routed dispatch has been recorded
yet — or merged hook changes were never synced to ~/.claude; run
hooks/sync-to-user-claude.py or restart the session.
Recorded events are the only source this skill reads. Reconstructing decisions from memory or conversation history defeats its purpose — with no log, there is nothing to read, and the honest answer is exactly that.
GATE: Log found and non-empty. Proceed only when gate passes.
Phase 2: PARSE
Goal: Extract events and filter to the user's query.
Step 1: Read the events
Parse each line as one JSON object. Two event types (full semantics: references/trace-schema.md; source of truth: hooks/lib/route_events.py).
DECISION — one per /do-routed dispatch:
| Field | Meaning |
|---|---|
ts | Epoch seconds (float) when the dispatch was recorded |
session | Session id ("" when unknown) |
request_snippet | First 200 chars of the routed request |
agent, skill, complexity | The chosen route |
health_at_decision | Picked pair's confidence at decision time; null = no weight row or never evaluated (disambiguate with gate_inputs_present) |
n, failure | The other demote-floor inputs, snapshotted with health |
action | Step-1.5 health-gate outcome: keep, demote, or tiebreak |
alternates | Keys offered as alternatives; null when none recorded |
gate_inputs_present | true = the marker carried a health= token; false/absent = legacy marker, health never read |
OUTCOME — one per finalized dispatch:
| Field | Meaning |
|---|---|
ts | Epoch seconds when the outcome was finalized |
session | Session id |
key | Routing key {agent}:{skill} (agent-only {agent}: when skill unknown) |
outcome | success, failure, or neutral |
reason | Short cause (e.g. tool-errors, rejection, acceptance, neutral-new-topic); absent in older events |
routing_relevant | true = a signal the confidence loop acts on; absent = relevance not asserted |
Additive-field history: older lines may lack n, failure, action, alternates, gate_inputs_present, reason, routing_relevant. An absent field means "not recorded then", never corruption.
Step 2: Filter to the user's query
| User signal | Filter strategy |
|---|---|
| Names an agent or skill | DECISION events where agent or skill matches, or the name appears in alternates; OUTCOME events whose key contains it |
| "Why did I get routed here" / latest dispatch | Most recent DECISION events (tail of the log), current session first |
| Asks about outcome ("did it work", "why failure") | OUTCOME events, joined back to their decisions |
| Names a session | Filter both types on session |
| No specific target | Chronological timeline of the most recent session |
Step 3: Join outcomes to decisions
Match an OUTCOME to its DECISION on the same session AND key == "{agent}:{skill}". A decision with no matched outcome is pending (the finalizer runs on a later user prompt) or was never finalized — report that state as-is.
GATE: At least one decision event parsed and filtered. Proceed only when gate passes.
Phase 3: PRESENT
Goal: Format events as a human-readable decision timeline.
Step 1: Build the timeline
Sort by ts (numeric — concurrent appends can interleave lines out of order). Convert ts to local ISO time for display; show raw ts on request. For each decision:
[TIME] {agent} + {skill} ({complexity})
Request: "{request_snippet}"
Health at decision: {health line — see below}
Alternates: {alternates, or "none recorded"}
Outcome: {outcome} ({reason}) — or "pending: not yet finalized"
Health line — three recorded states, rendered distinctly:
| Recorded | Render as |
|---|---|
Numeric health_at_decision | 0.62 (n=7, failure=1) → action=keep |
null + gate_inputs_present: true | no weight row at decision time (new pair) |
null + gate_inputs_present false/absent | health gate not instrumented for this dispatch (legacy marker) |
Group entries by session when the timeline spans more than one, to prevent wall-of-text.
Step 2: Lead with the answer to the user's question
If the user asked "why did I get routed here?", lead with the matching decision, then offer surrounding context:
You asked: "Why did I get the governance agent?"
Decision at [TIME]:
Route: toolkit-governance-engineer + pr-workflow (Complex)
Request: "ship the explanation-traces repoint as a green-CI PR..."
Health at decision: no weight row at decision time (new pair)
Alternates: none recorded
Outcome: pending — not yet finalized
--- Session timeline (3 dispatches) ---
[... remaining entries ...]
Step 3: Flag gaps honestly
When entries lack additive fields or matched outcomes, say so explicitly:
Note: [N] decision(s) predate the health-gate instrumentation — they show
WHAT was routed but carry no health data. [M] decision(s) have no matched
outcome: pending or never finalized.
Incomplete data presented honestly beats complete-looking data that includes fabrication. Leave gaps as gaps.
GATE: Timeline presented. User's question answered from recorded events. Done.
Examples
Example 1: General session review
User says: "Show me the decision log"
skill: explanation-traces
Actions:
- Locate route-events.jsonl (Phase 1)
- Parse decisions and outcomes for the most recent session (Phase 2)
- Present chronological timeline with joined outcomes (Phase 3) Result: Session dispatch history — route, health at decision, outcome — per entry
Example 2: Specific routing question
User says: "Why did I get routed to that agent?"
skill: explanation-traces "why that agent?"
Actions:
- Locate route-events.jsonl (Phase 1)
- Tail the decision events; filter to the latest dispatch in this session (Phase 2)
- Lead with that decision — route, request snippet, health gate inputs, alternates — then the session timeline (Phase 3) Result: Evidence-backed routing explanation from the recorded event, never post-hoc rationalization
Example 3: Outcome investigation
User says: "Why was that dispatch marked a failure?"
skill: explanation-traces "failure outcome"
Actions:
- Locate route-events.jsonl (Phase 1)
- Filter to
outcome: failureevents; join each to its decision by session + key (Phase 2) - Present the outcome's
reason(e.g.tool-errors,rejection) with the originating decision (Phase 3) Result: The recorded failure cause, with the route and request that produced it
Patterns to Detect and Fix
Pattern 1: Evidence-Backed Trace Reading
Wrong: Reconstructing "why" from memory when the log is missing. Right: If no log exists, say so, name the real path and producing hook, and stop. Never fabricate an explanation.
Pattern 2: Distinguish the Three Health States
Wrong: Rendering every null health as "no data".
Right: null + gate_inputs_present: true = pick had no weight row (new pair). null + false/absent = legacy marker, health never read. Different facts; render them differently.
Pattern 3: Join by Session and Key
Wrong: Pairing an outcome with "the decision right above it" in the file.
Right: Match on session + key == "{agent}:{skill}". Interleaved sessions make file adjacency meaningless.
Pattern 4: Absent Field Is Not Corruption
Wrong: Flagging pre-instrumentation lines as malformed because gate_inputs_present is missing.
Right: Fields were added over time; treat absence as "not recorded then" and say so.
Pattern 5: Answer the Specific Question First
Wrong: Always dumping the full timeline regardless of what the user asked. Right: Lead with the specific answer, then offer full context as supplementary detail.
Error Handling
Error: No Log File Found
Cause: No /do-routed dispatch recorded yet, hooks never synced to ~/.claude, or CLAUDE_LEARNING_DIR points elsewhere.
Solution: Report the resolved path and the producing hook (hooks/routing-decision-recorder.py). Suggest hooks/sync-to-user-claude.py when hook changes were merged mid-session. Skip any reconstruction from conversation history.
Error: Malformed JSONL Line
Cause: Truncated append (rare — per-line appends are atomic) or manual edit. Solution: Skip the bad line, keep parsing the rest, and report the count and line numbers of skipped lines. JSONL fails per line, never whole-file.
Error: Log Has No Decision Events
Cause: File exists but every line is an OUTCOME, or the recorder's marker parsing is failing.
Solution: Report counts by type. Point to references/error-handling.md for the recorder diagnosis steps.
Error: User Asks About a Dispatch Not in the Log
Cause: The recorder only records /do-routed top-level dispatches — nested fan-out and manual Agent calls are deliberately excluded.
Solution: Show what IS recorded and explain the exclusion. Full mapping: references/error-handling.md.
References
Reference Loading Table
| Task type | Signals | Reference file |
|---|---|---|
| Reading or explaining event fields | "health_at_decision", "gate_inputs_present", "alternates", "key", "schema" | references/trace-schema.md |
| Diagnosing wrong or thin trace data | "health null", "no alternates", "legacy marker", "not instrumented" | references/preferred-patterns.md |
| Handling parse or read errors | "malformed", "missing field", "no decisions", "not found", "pending" | references/error-handling.md |
| Presenting filtered timeline | "why did you", "show trace", "decision log", "explain routing" | references/trace-schema.md |
Reference Files
references/trace-schema.md: Real event schema for route-events.jsonl — DECISION and OUTCOME fields, health states, join rules, examplesreferences/preferred-patterns.md: Failure mode catalog for reading the log — join mistakes, health-state conflation, privacy — with detection commandsreferences/error-handling.md: Error-fix mappings — missing log, malformed lines, no decisions, unmatched outcomes, unrecorded dispatches
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 419
- Forks
- 44
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
explanation-traces- Source
- github.com/notque/vexjoy-agent