Impact Analysis with GitNexus

SkillSearch

The gitnexus-impact-analysis skill lets an AI agent check what code depends on a function and predict what breaks before changing it. It binds a specific repository, maps direct and indirect callers of a symbol, and scans pending git changes to assign a risk level. Uncertain results are flagged rather than treated as safe.

Use Impact Analysis with GitNexus in Claude, ChatGPT or Ahel Desktop

Free. Sign in, add Impact Analysis with GitNexus and connect your AI. About a minute.

Also: Claude Code · Cursor · Codex

Then ask your AI: use the Impact Analysis with GitNexus skill

Details

Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.

Have a git repository with the code you want to analyze.

Impact Analysis with GitNexusStart free

What your AI can do with it

  • Bind a specific repository before running any dependency queries
  • Map direct callers of a symbol
  • Map indirect callers of a symbol
  • Scan pending git changes with a git-diff scan
  • Assign a risk level to a proposed edit
  • Flag uncertain results instead of assuming safety

Getting started

  1. Have a git repository with the code you want to analyze.
  2. Add the gitnexus-impact-analysis skill to your agent.
  3. Bind the skill to the specific repository you are working in.
  4. Ask the agent what depends on a symbol or what will break before editing.

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by abhigyanpatwari/gitnexus in .claude/skills/gitnexus-impact-analysis/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

When to Use

  • "Is it safe to change this function?"
  • "What will break if I modify X?"
  • "Show me the blast radius"
  • "Who uses this code?"
  • Before making non-trivial code changes
  • Before committing — to understand what your changes affect

Bind the repository first

Impact analysis is the gate that authorizes an edit, so it must answer for the repository you are about to edit.

Call list_repos {} before the first tool call. With one indexed repository, use the examples below as written. With more than one, pass repo on every call: an omitted repo normally errors, but under an MCP policy with a configured default it resolves to that default silently. If you cannot tell which repository is meant, stop and ask — every result below an ambiguous identity inherits the ambiguity. list_repos is paginated, so page with offset: pagination.nextOffset until hasMore is false before concluding a repository is absent.

detect_changes takes worktree when your changes are in a linked worktree the MCP server was not launched from. The server auto-detects a worktree only when it was launched from inside one; otherwise git diff runs in the wrong checkout and reports zero changed symbols — a false clean check that carries none of the degradation flags described below. In the CLI fallbacks, --repo . means the current checkout; pass the intended repository path instead when you are not standing in it.

State the bound identity with your risk report:

Repository: <name> (<path>)   Worktree: <path>   Index: <commit>, <n> behind HEAD

Workflow

0. list_repos {}                                           → Bind repo (and worktree)
1. impact({target: "X", direction: "upstream"}) or `node .gitnexus/run.cjs impact "X" --direction upstream --repo .`
2. READ gitnexus://repo/{name}/processes                   → Check affected execution flows
3. detect_changes({scope: "all"}) or `node .gitnexus/run.cjs detect-changes --scope all --repo .`
4. Assess risk and report to user, echoing repo/worktree/index identity

If "Index is stale" → run node .gitnexus/run.cjs analyze in terminal. Hot-tool staleness names which index answered (branch/lastCommit) and how fresh it is (status). Re-analyze only for behind or diverged — current is identity, unknown is unmeasurable. If .gitnexus/run.cjs is missing, replace node .gitnexus/run.cjs with npx gitnexus in the fallback commands.

Checklist

- [ ] list_repos {} — bind repo; explicit repo when >1 indexed, ask if ambiguous
- [ ] impact({target, direction: "upstream"}) or CLI fallback to find dependents
- [ ] Review d=1 items first (these WILL BREAK)
- [ ] Check high-confidence (>0.8) dependencies
- [ ] READ processes to check affected execution flows
- [ ] detect_changes({scope: "all"}) or CLI fallback for pre-commit check
- [ ] Confirm the checkout you edited is the checkout that was diffed
- [ ] Assess risk level and report, stating repo/worktree/index identity

Understanding Output

DepthRisk LevelMeaning
d=1WILL BREAKDirect callers/importers
d=2LIKELY AFFECTEDIndirect dependencies
d=3MAY NEED TESTINGTransitive effects

Risk Assessment

AffectedRisk
<5 symbols, few processesLOW
5-15 symbols, 2-5 processesMEDIUM
>15 symbols or many processesHIGH
Critical path (auth, payments)CRITICAL
Zero callers foundUNKNOWN

UNKNOWN is not a low rung on this scale — it means the walk could not answer. An empty caller set is equally consistent with "genuinely unused" and "the callers are not resolvable by the index" (plain-object property access, dynamic dispatch, cross-language calls), so few-callers ⇒ LOW does not apply. The result carries a riskNote saying so. Confirm with a text search before treating the symbol as safe to change or delete.

risk is the edit gate: warn on HIGH/CRITICAL and stop on UNKNOWN until the uncertainty is resolved. Within single-repo mode, compare File and symbol targets with local riskSharedAxes (direct/total only). Within group mode, compare only group results: their riskSharedAxes overlays resolved cross-repo crossings on that local value. Never use either field to waive the edit gate. Check riskScale.unusedAxes before comparing kinds: MCP File walks omit process/module axes, while web Graph-RAG expands File targets to in-file symbols before enrichment.

Tools

impact — the primary tool for symbol blast radius. If MCP is unavailable, use node .gitnexus/run.cjs impact <symbol> --direction upstream --repo . instead:

impact({
  target: "validateUser",
  repo: "my-app",          // required once >1 repository is indexed
  direction: "upstream",
  minConfidence: 0.8,
  maxDepth: 3
})

→ d=1 (WILL BREAK):
  - loginHandler (src/auth/login.ts:42) [CALLS, 100%]
  - apiMiddleware (src/api/middleware.ts:15) [CALLS, 100%]

→ d=2 (LIKELY AFFECTED):
  - authRouter (src/routes/auth.ts:22) [CALLS, 95%]

detect_changes — git-diff based impact analysis. If MCP is unavailable, use node .gitnexus/run.cjs detect-changes --scope all --repo . instead:

detect_changes({scope: "all"})

→ Changed: 5 symbols in 3 files
→ Affected: LoginFlow, TokenRefresh, APIMiddlewarePipeline
→ Risk: MEDIUM

Add repo once more than one repository is indexed, and worktree: "<abs path>" when your changes are in a linked worktree the server was not launched from.

partial: true (a graph query failed) or truncated: true (the changed-symbol listing was capped) means the result is short of the truth, and reads like UNKNOWN above: a zero there means unseen, not unaffected. Re-run it rather than tick the pre-commit check.

A wrong-worktree zero carries neither flag and is shape-identical to a genuine clean result, so confirm the checkout you edited is the one that was diffed before treating an empty change set as a passed check.

Example: "What breaks if I change validateUser?"

0. list_repos {}
   → total: 2 (my-app, billing-api) — both define validateUser, so bind explicitly

1. impact({target: "validateUser", repo: "my-app", direction: "upstream"}) or `node .gitnexus/run.cjs impact "validateUser" --direction upstream --repo .`
   → d=1: loginHandler, apiMiddleware (WILL BREAK)
   → d=2: authRouter, sessionManager (LIKELY AFFECTED)

2. READ gitnexus://repo/my-app/processes
   → LoginFlow and TokenRefresh touch validateUser

3. Risk: 2 direct callers, 2 processes = MEDIUM
   Repository: my-app (/abs/path/my-app)  Worktree: same  Index: current

With a single indexed repository, step 0 returns total: 1 and the repo argument drops out of every call above.

Signals

GitHub stars
48k
Forks
5k
Last commit
Oct 2026

Questions

Is it safe to change X?
The skill maps direct and indirect callers of X and scans pending git changes to assign a risk level. It flags uncertain results rather than assuming the change is safe.
What depends on this?
It runs dependency queries to map direct and indirect callers of the symbol you name, after binding the repository.
What will break?
It predicts what breaks by combining caller maps with a git-diff scan of pending changes and assigning a risk level.
Does it need a specific repository?
Yes. The skill guides the agent through binding a specific repository before running dependency queries.
Does it assume changes are safe?
No. It flags anything uncertain rather than assuming it is safe.
Advanced
Item type
skill
Key
gitnexus-gitnexus-impact-analysis
Source
github.com/abhigyanpatwari/gitnexus