/legal-diagram

SkillDocs & knowledge

Use when a user needs a legal or legal-adjacent Mermaid diagram from a document, pasted text, matter description, process, timeline, party map, obligation map, corporate structure, funds flow, or compliance workflow. Trigger on: "diagram this contract", "visualise this deal/matter", "map the parties", "create a timeline of events", "make an org chart", "obligation checklist", "export as HTML diagram". Not for general-purpose non-legal diagrams, pure graphic design, image generation, or legal advice.

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the /legal-diagram skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills in skills/legal-diagram-sam-zhai/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

Standalone skill: turn legal material into a context-appropriate Mermaid diagram, with an optional downloadable HTML figure. A structure-preserving Python engine extracts a typed ground truth; directive-driven LLM enrichment fills the gaps; a selector picks the diagram type; the diagram is generated natively.

Routing gate

Every real diagram request runs in this fixed order: first-run check, ingest, build-mode gate, generate, report gate. Non-diagram intents short-circuit at Step 0.

Three human gates = mandatory hard stops: GATE 0 (tutorial offer), GATE A (build mode), GATE B (HTML report). Gate discipline, no exceptions:

  • Present each as structured choice (the question tool). No such tool → numbered plain-text list. Either way, STOP, wait for reply.
  • Never skip a gate. Never infer its answer from wording. Never generate past an unanswered gate. Detailed, specific, or named-diagram request = still a request, not a gate answer.
  • Only a literal typed flag may pre-answer: --direct/--guided (GATE A), --html (GATE B), --tutorial (tutorial). Nothing else counts.

Step 0 — Intent and first-run

Check explicit short-circuits first:

  1. Tutorial signals: "tutorial", "show me how", "first time", "demo", "walk me through", --tutorial. → Load workflows/tutorial.md. Stop here.
  2. Setup signals: "check setup", "install deps", "is setup ready". → Load shared/setup-check.md, run check_setup.py, report. Stop here.

Otherwise this is a real diagram request (a file, pasted text, or a matter description). Detect first-run:

Run python scripts/first_run.py. Parse {state}: returning, first_run, or unknown. Script absent, non-zero exit, or no JSON → treat as unknown.

  • returning (confirmed) → no offer; user ran skill before. Continue to Step 1.
  • first_run, unknown, or anything not a confirmed returningGATE 0 (hard stop): "First time here. Want a quick tutorial, or go straight to your diagram?" Options: Start tutorial (recommended, list first) / Skip, straight to my diagram. Present as structured choice, or numbered plain-text list if host has no choice tool, then STOP, wait for reply. After answer, run python scripts/first_run.py --mark to record offer (best-effort; on unknown state with no writable disk, mark may not persist, fine). Then: tutorial → load workflows/tutorial.md, stop; skip → continue to Step 1.

unknown defaults to offering, not suppressing: surface the choice, do not decide for user. Suppress only on confirmed returning. Tutorial stays reachable any time by keyword.

Step 1 — Ingest before choosing a lane

Detect input: file path, pasted text, or conversation/matter description. Load shared/setup-check.md (session-cached).

Multi-file scope gate (2+ files) ⛔: mandatory hard stop unless user already stated scope. Present as structured choice, or numbered plain-text list if host has no choice tool, then STOP, wait for reply. Options: One combined diagram / One per document. Never infer scope from wording. Store diagram_scope. Single file, or scope user explicitly stated → skip.

Run Pass 1 only (deterministic manifest, no LLM): workflows/extract.md Steps 0-2. Store the result as manifest_cache and pass it to the chosen lane so Pass 1 never re-runs. Matter-description-only input (no docs) has no Pass 1 counts; proceed without them.

Step 2 — GATE A: build mode (after ingestion) ⛔ BLOCKING

GATE A = mandatory hard stop. ALWAYS fires unless user typed a literal --direct or --guided flag. Do not load a lane and do not generate any diagram until GATE A answered.

Only a literal flag pre-answers. Sole answer-carrier = exact token --direct or --guided in user's message. Present → state resolved mode in one line ("Build mode: direct (flag)") and load the lane. User's own recorded choice, not a model decision.

Everything else → present the gate and STOP. Detailed, specific, or named-diagram request ("comprehensive diagram of this exact case", "make an org chart") = a request, NOT a gate answer. Never infer build mode from wording. Lead with what Pass 1 found, plain language: "Found [N parties, M events, ...]. How should I build it?" (omit counts for no-docs input). Present as structured choice, or numbered plain-text list if host has no choice tool, then wait for reply. Options, fixed order:

  • Guided, step by step
  • Direct, just make it

Do not reorder options, do not mark one implied from wording. Order fixed; choice is user's.

On choice: load workflows/direct.md or workflows/guided.md, passing manifest_cache, input_source, and diagram_scope. Both lanes share workflows/generation.md for the build; GATE B (HTML report) fires there.

User-facing language (casual-friendly). Never show Mermaid-internal type names to user. Use the plain-language names in shared/diagram-type-map.md § Plain-language names — "timeline", "org chart", "flowchart", "obligation checklist", and so on. Accept plain-word requests too ("make me an org chart") and map them through the same glossary. Legal vocabulary is fine; technical diagram vocabulary stays internal.

Output language (EN/FR). Gates, digest, elicitation, and rationale render in the user's prompt language (EN or FR; FR diagram names per the glossary's FR column). Extracted evidence and diagram labels stay verbatim source language, never translated. HTML export chrome follows via render_html.py --ui-lang en|fr.

Scripts

All script commands run from the skill root (the folder containing this SKILL.md). Resolve the skill root once, then invoke scripts as python scripts/<name>.py.

ScriptRole
scripts/check_setup.pyDependency check → {ok, missing[], installed[], optional{}}
scripts/first_run.pyFirst-run state → {state} (returning/first_run/unknown); --mark consumes flag
scripts/extract_entities.pyOrchestrator: normalize → detect → manifest JSON
scripts/diagram_selector.pyEnriched extraction + intent → recommended type
scripts/patch_gate.pyPass 2 patch gate: validates and applies LLM JSON Patch → {ok, findings[], enriched_extraction_result}
scripts/eval_pass2.pyPass 2 eval grader: scores LLM patch against label expectations → {ok, results[], score}
scripts/render_html.pyMermaid + FigureDescription → standalone HTML

scripts/normalize/ (format adapters) and scripts/extraction/ (candidate harvesters, resolver, and materializer) are libraries used by the orchestrator. Install deps once: pip install -r requirements.txt -c constraints.txt for release-verified versions, or omit -c constraints.txt for broad compatibility testing.

Workflow loading map

Intent/NeedFile
First-run walkthrough + setup gateworkflows/tutorial.md
Interactive default lane (digest/elicit → menu)workflows/guided.md
Power-user lane (read all signals, hard cap 1)workflows/direct.md
Shared generation core (select → guard → generate → deliver)workflows/generation.md
Two-pass extraction (called by both lanes)workflows/extract.md
Pass 2 quality eval (execute enrichment, grade against labels)workflows/eval-pass2.md
No-docs intake sets + delivery patternshared/elicitation.md
Standalone HTML figure exportworkflows/html-export.md

Reference loading map

Intent/NeedFile
Dependency-check procedureshared/setup-check.md
Per-type guards, entity normalization, parser bugsshared/parser-guards.md
FigureDescription fields, captions, legends, risk rubric, caveatsshared/figure-description-schema.md
30 legal categories → Mermaid typeshared/diagram-type-map.md
Semantic node categories, palette, CSS class namingshared/node-styles.md
Field catalogue + detection tiers + signalsreferences/extraction-schema.md

Output

Output is CLI display only: the fenced Mermaid block renders as an artifact in the Claude web app and as syntax-highlighted code in the CLI. No note file is written. After the block, GATE B offers an HTML report as a selectable choice; the export escapes matter text, runs Mermaid in strict mode, uses vendored Mermaid when present, and loads the pinned CDN fallback only when explicitly enabled. Full output rules: workflows/generation.md § Step 5.

Boundaries

Mermaid is for thinking, planning, explaining, and generating structure. It is not legal advice, not a court-ready exhibit, and not a substitute for legal writing. Every diagram carries a caveat line. Confidential material stays in tools approved for that matter.

Signals

GitHub stars
691
Forks
88
Last commit
Sep 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
legal-diagram
Source
github.com/lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills