Model Theft (OWASP LLM10:2025)

SkillSecurity

Detects inference endpoints without authentication or throttling, allowing

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the Model Theft (OWASP LLM10:2025) skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by thejefflarson/soundcheck in .claude/skills/model-theft/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

What this checks

Prevents unauthorized replication of proprietary models through API abuse. Unauthenticated or unthrottled inference endpoints let attackers systematically query a model to reconstruct its weights or distill a clone — stealing the commercial and IP value of the deployment.

Vulnerable patterns

  • Inference endpoint has no authentication — any client can query freely
  • Rate limiting applied per IP only, trivially bypassed with rotating proxies
  • Response includes raw logprobs or full embedding vectors, enabling extraction
  • No monitoring for systematic/grid-search query patterns that signal extraction attempts

Fix immediately

Flag the vulnerable code and explain the risk. Then suggest a fix that establishes these properties:

  1. Every inference endpoint requires authentication — API key, bearer token, or mTLS. Unauthenticated endpoints are free training data for anyone who wants to clone the model.
  2. Rate limits are keyed on the authenticated principal, not the IP. IP-only throttles are defeated by rotating proxies and residential IP pools; a per-user or per-key quota follows the attacker even as IPs churn.
  3. Extraction-signal fields are stripped from responses. Log-probabilities, full embedding vectors, and per-token probabilities are the primary signals distillation attacks use to reconstruct a model. If a caller does not strictly need them, do not return them.
  4. Query patterns are monitored for extraction signatures — high-volume, low-entropy, systematic grid-search probes. Alerts fire on anomalies; the handler records user identity, timestamp, and prompt (or a content fingerprint) for after-the-fact investigation.

Translate each principle to the serving framework, auth provider, and rate-limiter of the audited file. Use the framework's documented authentication and throttling middleware — do not roll your own.

Verification

  • Every inference endpoint requires a valid API key or bearer token
  • Rate limits are enforced per authenticated user, not per IP address
  • Log-probabilities, raw embeddings, and weight data are excluded from API responses
  • Query logs include user identity, timestamp, and either the prompt itself or a stable fingerprint (hash, embedding, or normalized form) sufficient to detect content-pattern anomalies. Logging only metadata (length, token count, request id) without any reconstructable prompt signal does not satisfy this. Choice between raw prompt and fingerprint is a privacy tradeoff — document the decision.

References

Signals

GitHub stars
20
Last commit
Jul 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
model-theft
Source
github.com/thejefflarson/soundcheck