Agent Testing Framework

SkillSecurity

5-layer testing approach for agent validation including adversarial testing, security validation, and prompt injection resistance

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the Agent Testing Framework skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by nwave-ai/nwave in nWave/skills/nw-agent-testing/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

5-Layer Testing Approach

Layer 1: Output Quality (Unit-Level)

Validate agent produces correct, well-structured outputs for typical inputs.

Test: Agent follows workflow phases | Outputs match expected format/structure | Domain-specific rules correctly applied | Token efficiency within bounds

How: Manual invocation with representative inputs. Check against acceptance criteria in agent description.

Layer 2: Integration / Handoff Validation

Validate correct input/output between agents in workflows.

Test: Input parsing handles upstream format | Output format matches downstream expectations | Error signals propagate correctly | Subagent mode activation works (skip greet, execute autonomously)

How: End-to-end workflow execution through full agent chain (e.g., DISCUSS -> DESIGN -> DELIVER).

Layer 3: Adversarial Output Validation

Challenge validity of agent outputs rather than accepting at face value.

Test: Source verification (cited sources real and accurate?) | Bias detection (favors one approach without evidence?) | Edge case coverage | Completeness (required sections present?)

How: Peer review by -reviewer agent using structured critique dimensions.

Layer 4: Adversarial Verification (Peer Review)

Independent review to catch biases and blind spots in agent design.

Test: Definition follows validation checklist? | Redundant Claude default instructions? | Over/under-specified? | Could simpler agent achieve same results?

How: @nw-agent-builder validates via 11-point checklist or @agent-builder-reviewer runs structured review.

Layer 5: Security Validation

Test resilience against misuse and prompt injection.

Test: Tool restriction enforcement | maxTurns respected | Permission mode correctly scoped | Agent stays within declared scope

How: Frontmatter fields enforce at platform level. Verify configuration.

Prompt Injection Resistance

Claude Code platform provides injection resistance through: subagent isolation (own context, no sub-subagents) | Tool restriction via frontmatter tools | Permission modes via permissionMode | Hook-based validation (PreToolUse, PostToolUse)

Do NOT add prose-based injection defense. Configure platform features:

---
tools: Read, Glob, Grep           # Only tools this agent needs
maxTurns: 30                       # Prevents runaway execution
permissionMode: default            # User approves dangerous actions
---

Security Validation Checklist

  • tools restricted to minimum necessary (least privilege)
  • maxTurns set to prevent runaway execution
  • permissionMode appropriate for risk level
  • No Bash unless agent requires command execution
  • No Write unless agent creates/modifies files
  • Description accurately describes scope
  • Subagent mode handles autonomous execution correctly
  • No sensitive data hardcoded in definition

Testing Workflow for New Agents

  1. Create with minimal definition
  2. Layer 1: Invoke with 2-3 representative inputs, check outputs
  3. Layer 2: Run in workflow chain if applicable
  4. Fix failures observed
  5. Validate: Run 11-point checklist
  6. Iterate: Add instructions only for observed failure modes

Signals

GitHub stars
610
Forks
64
Last commit
Sep 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
nw-agent-testing
Source
github.com/nwave-ai/nwave