OpenRouter Performance Tuning

SkillDev tools

'Optimize OpenRouter request latency and throughput. Use when building

Use OpenRouter Performance Tuning in Claude, ChatGPT or Ahel Desktop

Free. Sign in, add OpenRouter Performance Tuning and connect your AI. About a minute.

Also: Claude Code · Cursor · Codex

Then ask your AI: use the OpenRouter Performance Tuning skill

Details

Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.

Add Ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.

OpenRouter Performance TuningStart free

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace in skills/.curated/openrouter-performance-tuning/SKILL.md and read by Ahel’s review.

Overview

OpenRouter adds minimal overhead (~50-100ms) to direct provider calls. Most latency comes from the upstream model. Key levers: model selection (smaller = faster), streaming (lower TTFT), parallel requests, prompt size reduction, and provider routing to faster infrastructure. This skill covers benchmarking, streaming optimization, concurrent processing, and connection tuning.

Prerequisites

  • An OpenRouter API key (sk-or-v1-...) exported as OPENROUTER_API_KEY — see the openrouter-install-auth skill for setup
  • Python 3.8+ with the OpenAI SDK (openai package) — the examples use both the sync OpenAI client and AsyncOpenAI for parallel processing
  • Credits on the key if you benchmark paid models like anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet; a :free model is enough to validate the benchmark harness itself
  • HTTP-Referer / X-Title header values for your app (set in every client constructor here)

Instructions

  1. Establish a baseline: run benchmark_model() from Benchmark Latency against your candidate models (e.g. openai/gpt-4o-mini vs anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet) and record p50/p95.
  2. Check the results against the Model Speed Tiers table to confirm each candidate sits in the right tier for your latency budget (200-500ms TTFT fastest tier; 5-30s for reasoning models).
  3. Switch user-facing paths to stream_completion() per Streaming for Lower TTFT and verify ttft_ms drops (typically 2-10x).
  4. Move batch workloads to parallel_completions() per Parallel Request Processing, capping concurrency with asyncio.Semaphore (max_concurrent=5-10).
  5. Apply Connection Optimization — one shared client with timeout=30.0 and max_retries=2 instead of a new client per request.
  6. Work through the Performance Optimization Checklist (set max_tokens, shrink prompts, consider :nitro variants and provider routing), then re-run the benchmark to quantify each change.

Benchmark Latency

import os, time, statistics
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://openrouter.ai/api/v1",
    api_key=os.environ["OPENROUTER_API_KEY"],
    default_headers={"HTTP-Referer": "https://my-app.com", "X-Title": "my-app"},
)

def benchmark_model(model: str, prompt: str = "Say hello", n: int = 5) -> dict:
    """Benchmark a model's latency over N requests."""
    latencies = []
    for _ in range(n):
        start = time.monotonic()
        response = client.chat.completions.create(
            model=model,
            messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
            max_tokens=50,
        )
        latencies.append((time.monotonic() - start) * 1000)

    return {
        "model": model,
        "p50_ms": round(statistics.median(latencies)),
        "p95_ms": round(sorted(latencies)[int(len(latencies) * 0.95)]),
        "avg_ms": round(statistics.mean(latencies)),
        "min_ms": round(min(latencies)),
        "max_ms": round(max(latencies)),
    }

# Compare fast vs slow models
for model in ["openai/gpt-4o-mini", "anthropic/claude-3-haiku", "anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet"]:
    result = benchmark_model(model)
    print(f"{result['model']}: p50={result['p50_ms']}ms p95={result['p95_ms']}ms")

Streaming for Lower TTFT

def stream_completion(messages, model="openai/gpt-4o-mini", **kwargs):
    """Stream response for lower time-to-first-token."""
    start = time.monotonic()
    first_token_time = None
    full_content = []

    stream = client.chat.completions.create(
        model=model, messages=messages, stream=True,
        stream_options={"include_usage": True},  # Get token counts at end
        **kwargs,
    )

    for chunk in stream:
        if chunk.choices and chunk.choices[0].delta.content:
            if first_token_time is None:
                first_token_time = (time.monotonic() - start) * 1000
            full_content.append(chunk.choices[0].delta.content)

    total_time = (time.monotonic() - start) * 1000
    return {
        "content": "".join(full_content),
        "ttft_ms": round(first_token_time or 0),
        "total_ms": round(total_time),
    }

Parallel Request Processing

import asyncio
from openai import AsyncOpenAI

async def parallel_completions(prompts: list[str], model="openai/gpt-4o-mini",
                                max_concurrent=10, **kwargs):
    """Process multiple prompts concurrently."""
    semaphore = asyncio.Semaphore(max_concurrent)
    client = AsyncOpenAI(
        base_url="https://openrouter.ai/api/v1",
        api_key=os.environ["OPENROUTER_API_KEY"],
        default_headers={"HTTP-Referer": "https://my-app.com", "X-Title": "my-app"},
    )

    async def process(prompt):
        async with semaphore:
            response = await client.chat.completions.create(
                model=model,
                messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}],
                **kwargs,
            )
            return response.choices[0].message.content

    return await asyncio.gather(*[process(p) for p in prompts])

# 10 requests in parallel instead of sequential
results = asyncio.run(parallel_completions(
    ["Summarize: " + text for text in documents],
    max_concurrent=5,
    max_tokens=200,
))

Performance Optimization Checklist

OptimizationImpactEffort
Use streamingTTFT drops 2-10xLow
Use smaller models for simple tasks2-5x fasterLow
Reduce prompt sizeProportional to reductionMedium
Set max_tokensCaps response timeLow
Parallel requestsN requests in ~1 request timeMedium
Use :nitro variantFaster inference (where available)Low
Provider routing to fastest10-30% latency reductionLow
Connection keep-aliveSaves TCP/TLS handshakeLow

Model Speed Tiers

SpeedModelsTypical TTFT
Fastestopenai/gpt-4o-mini, anthropic/claude-3-haiku200-500ms
Fastopenai/gpt-4o, google/gemini-2.0-flash-001500ms-1s
Standardanthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet1-3s
Slowopenai/o1, reasoning models5-30s

Connection Optimization

# Reuse client instance (connection pooling)
# BAD: creating new client per request
for prompt in prompts:
    c = OpenAI(base_url="https://openrouter.ai/api/v1", ...)  # New TCP connection each time
    c.chat.completions.create(...)

# GOOD: reuse single client
client = OpenAI(
    base_url="https://openrouter.ai/api/v1",
    api_key=os.environ["OPENROUTER_API_KEY"],
    timeout=30.0,           # Set appropriate timeout
    max_retries=2,          # Built-in retry with backoff
    default_headers={"HTTP-Referer": "https://my-app.com", "X-Title": "my-app"},
)
for prompt in prompts:
    client.chat.completions.create(...)  # Reuses HTTP connection

Output

  • A latency benchmark table per model from benchmark_model(): p50_ms, p95_ms, avg_ms, min_ms, max_ms over N sample requests
  • Streaming metrics from stream_completion(): the full content plus ttft_ms and total_ms for each request
  • A list of completions from parallel_completions() produced in roughly one request's wall-clock time instead of N sequential round-trips
  • A prioritized tuning plan drawn from the Performance Optimization Checklist (lever, expected impact, effort)

Examples

Benchmark two fastest-tier candidates before committing to one:

for model in ["openai/gpt-4o-mini", "anthropic/claude-3-haiku"]:
    r = benchmark_model(model, n=5)
    print(f"{r['model']}: p50={r['p50_ms']}ms p95={r['p95_ms']}ms avg={r['avg_ms']}ms")
# openai/gpt-4o-mini: p50=430ms p95=610ms avg=455ms
# anthropic/claude-3-haiku: p50=395ms p95=580ms avg=418ms

Both land in the fastest tier (200-500ms typical TTFT), so choose on cost or quality — then stream_completion() cuts perceived latency further for user-facing paths. More worked examples: references/examples.md.

Error Handling

ErrorCauseFix
High TTFT (>5s)Model cold-starting or overloadedSwitch to :nitro variant or different provider
Timeout errorsmax_tokens too high or model too slowReduce max_tokens; use streaming; increase timeout
Throughput bottleneckSequential processingUse async + semaphore for concurrent requests
Inconsistent latencyProvider load variesUse provider.order to pin to fastest provider

Enterprise Considerations

  • Benchmark models in your infrastructure, not just locally -- network path matters
  • Use streaming for all user-facing requests to minimize perceived latency
  • Set max_tokens on every request to bound response time and cost
  • Reuse client instances to benefit from HTTP connection pooling
  • Use asyncio.Semaphore to control concurrency and avoid overwhelming the API
  • Monitor P95 latency, not just average -- tail latencies indicate provider issues
  • Consider :nitro model variants for latency-critical paths

References

Signals

GitHub stars
3k
Forks
415
Last commit
Oct 2026
Advanced
Item type
skill
Key
openrouter-performance-tuning
Source
github.com/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace