Python Anti-Patterns Checklist
SkillAI & modelsThe python-anti-patterns skill is a checklist your AI agent uses when reviewing Python code. It helps the agent spot common anti-patterns to avoid, whether you are reviewing a change, finishing an implementation, or debugging a problem that may come from a known bad practice.
Use Python Anti-Patterns Checklist in Claude, ChatGPT or Ahel Desktop
Free. Sign in, add Python Anti-Patterns Checklist and connect your AI. About a minute.
Also: Claude Code · Cursor · Codex
Then ask your AI: use the Python Anti-Patterns Checklist skill
Details
Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.
Account requirements not reviewed. Check the skill instructions before use; ahel provides instructions and does not run this skill.
No other account needed.
Have the Python code you want reviewed available to your agent.
What your AI can do with it
- Check Python code against a list of common anti-patterns
- Review code changes before they are finalized
- Support debugging when an issue may come from a known bad practice
- Act as a checklist during a code review
Getting started
- Have the Python code you want reviewed available to your agent.
- Add the python-anti-patterns skill to your agent's available skills.
- Ask the agent to review the code or debug the issue using the skill.
- Read the anti-patterns the agent reports and decide what to change.
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by wshobson/agents in plugins/python-development/skills/python-anti-patterns/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
A reference checklist of common mistakes and anti-patterns in Python code. Review this before finalizing implementations to catch issues early.
When to Use This Skill
- Reviewing code before merge
- Debugging mysterious issues
- Teaching or learning Python best practices
- Establishing team coding standards
- Refactoring legacy code
Note: This skill focuses on what to avoid. For guidance on positive patterns and architecture, see the python-design-patterns skill.
Infrastructure Anti-Patterns
Scattered Timeout/Retry Logic
# BAD: Timeout logic duplicated everywhere
def fetch_user(user_id):
try:
return requests.get(url, timeout=30)
except Timeout:
logger.warning("Timeout fetching user")
return None
def fetch_orders(user_id):
try:
return requests.get(url, timeout=30)
except Timeout:
logger.warning("Timeout fetching orders")
return None
Fix: Centralize in decorators or client wrappers.
# GOOD: Centralized retry logic
@retry(stop=stop_after_attempt(3), wait=wait_exponential())
def http_get(url: str) -> Response:
return requests.get(url, timeout=30)
Double Retry
# BAD: Retrying at multiple layers
@retry(max_attempts=3) # Application retry
def call_service():
return client.request() # Client also has retry configured!
Fix: Retry at one layer only. Know your infrastructure's retry behavior.
Hard-Coded Configuration
# BAD: Secrets and config in code
DB_HOST = "prod-db.example.com"
API_KEY = "sk-12345"
def connect():
return psycopg.connect(f"host={DB_HOST}...")
Fix: Use environment variables with typed settings.
# GOOD
from pydantic_settings import BaseSettings
class Settings(BaseSettings):
db_host: str = Field(alias="DB_HOST")
api_key: str = Field(alias="API_KEY")
settings = Settings()
Architecture Anti-Patterns
Exposed Internal Types
# BAD: Leaking ORM model to API
@app.get("/users/{id}")
def get_user(id: str) -> UserModel: # SQLAlchemy model
return db.query(UserModel).get(id)
Fix: Use DTOs/response models.
# GOOD
@app.get("/users/{id}")
def get_user(id: str) -> UserResponse:
user = db.query(UserModel).get(id)
return UserResponse.from_orm(user)
Mixed I/O and Business Logic
# BAD: SQL embedded in business logic
def calculate_discount(user_id: str) -> float:
user = db.query("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?", user_id)
orders = db.query("SELECT * FROM orders WHERE user_id = ?", user_id)
# Business logic mixed with data access
if len(orders) > 10:
return 0.15
return 0.0
Fix: Repository pattern. Keep business logic pure.
# GOOD
def calculate_discount(user: User, orders: list[Order]) -> float:
# Pure business logic, easily testable
if len(orders) > 10:
return 0.15
return 0.0
Error Handling Anti-Patterns
Bare Exception Handling
# BAD: Swallowing all exceptions
try:
process()
except Exception:
pass # Silent failure - bugs hidden forever
Fix: Catch specific exceptions. Log or handle appropriately.
# GOOD
try:
process()
except ConnectionError as e:
logger.warning("Connection failed, will retry", error=str(e))
raise
except ValueError as e:
logger.error("Invalid input", error=str(e))
raise BadRequestError(str(e))
Ignored Partial Failures
# BAD: Stops on first error
def process_batch(items):
results = []
for item in items:
result = process(item) # Raises on error - batch aborted
results.append(result)
return results
Fix: Capture both successes and failures.
# GOOD
def process_batch(items) -> BatchResult:
succeeded = {}
failed = {}
for idx, item in enumerate(items):
try:
succeeded[idx] = process(item)
except Exception as e:
failed[idx] = e
return BatchResult(succeeded, failed)
Missing Input Validation
# BAD: No validation
def create_user(data: dict):
return User(**data) # Crashes deep in code on bad input
Fix: Validate early at API boundaries.
# GOOD
def create_user(data: dict) -> User:
validated = CreateUserInput.model_validate(data)
return User.from_input(validated)
Resource Anti-Patterns
Unclosed Resources
# BAD: File never closed
def read_file(path):
f = open(path)
return f.read() # What if this raises?
Fix: Use context managers.
# GOOD
def read_file(path):
with open(path) as f:
return f.read()
Blocking in Async
# BAD: Blocks the entire event loop
async def fetch_data():
time.sleep(1) # Blocks everything!
response = requests.get(url) # Also blocks!
Fix: Use async-native libraries.
# GOOD
async def fetch_data():
await asyncio.sleep(1)
async with httpx.AsyncClient() as client:
response = await client.get(url)
Type Safety Anti-Patterns
Missing Type Hints
# BAD: No types
def process(data):
return data["value"] * 2
Fix: Annotate all public functions.
# GOOD
def process(data: dict[str, int]) -> int:
return data["value"] * 2
Untyped Collections
# BAD: Generic list without type parameter
def get_users() -> list:
...
Fix: Use type parameters.
# GOOD
def get_users() -> list[User]:
...
Testing Anti-Patterns
Only Testing Happy Paths
# BAD: Only tests success case
def test_create_user():
user = service.create_user(valid_data)
assert user.id is not None
Fix: Test error conditions and edge cases.
# GOOD
def test_create_user_success():
user = service.create_user(valid_data)
assert user.id is not None
def test_create_user_invalid_email():
with pytest.raises(ValueError, match="Invalid email"):
service.create_user(invalid_email_data)
def test_create_user_duplicate_email():
service.create_user(valid_data)
with pytest.raises(ConflictError):
service.create_user(valid_data)
Over-Mocking
# BAD: Mocking everything
def test_user_service():
mock_repo = Mock()
mock_cache = Mock()
mock_logger = Mock()
mock_metrics = Mock()
# Test doesn't verify real behavior
Fix: Use integration tests for critical paths. Mock only external services.
Quick Review Checklist
Before finalizing code, verify:
- No scattered timeout/retry logic (centralized)
- No double retry (app + infrastructure)
- No hard-coded configuration or secrets
- No exposed internal types (ORM models, protobufs)
- No mixed I/O and business logic
- No bare
except Exception: pass - No ignored partial failures in batches
- No missing input validation
- No unclosed resources (using context managers)
- No blocking calls in async code
- All public functions have type hints
- Collections have type parameters
- Error paths are tested
- Edge cases are covered
Common Fixes Summary
| Anti-Pattern | Fix |
|---|---|
| Scattered retry logic | Centralized decorators |
| Hard-coded config | Environment variables + pydantic-settings |
| Exposed ORM models | DTO/response schemas |
| Mixed I/O + logic | Repository pattern |
| Bare except | Catch specific exceptions |
| Batch stops on error | Return BatchResult with successes/failures |
| No validation | Validate at boundaries with Pydantic |
| Unclosed resources | Context managers |
| Blocking in async | Async-native libraries |
| Missing types | Type annotations on all public APIs |
| Only happy path tests | Test errors and edge cases |
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 40k
- Forks
- 4k
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Questions
- When should I use this skill?
- Use it when reviewing Python code, before finalizing an implementation, or when debugging an issue that might come from a known bad practice.
- Does it fix the anti-patterns it finds?
- The skill is a checklist for finding common anti-patterns. It does not state that it rewrites or fixes the code for you.
- Does it work for languages other than Python?
- No. The skill is for reviewing Python code and its checklist covers Python anti-patterns.
- Can it be used during a code review?
- Yes. The skill is meant to be used as a checklist when reviewing code.
Advanced
- Item type
- skill
- Key
python-anti-patterns- Source
- github.com/wshobson/agents
More in AI & models
Skill · anthropics
More in AI & modelswayfinder
Skill · mattpocock
More in AI & modelswizard
Skill · mattpocock
More in AI & modelsalgorithmic-art
Skill · anthropics
More in AI & modelscode-review-and-quality
Skill · addyosmani
More in AI & modelsai-first-engineering
Skill · affaan-m
More in AI & models