Agentic Quality Engineering
SkillAI & modelsAI agents as force multipliers for quality work. Core skill for all 19 QE agents using PACTS principles.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Agentic Quality Engineering skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe in .kiro/skills/qe-agentic-quality-engineering/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
<default_to_action> When implementing agentic QE or coordinating agents:
- SPAWN appropriate agent(s) for the task using
Tasktool with agent type - CONFIGURE agent coordination (hierarchical/mesh/sequential)
- EXECUTE with PACTS principles: Proactive analysis, Autonomous operation, Collaborative feedback, Targeted risk focus, Structured governance (observability and explainability of agent behavior)
- VALIDATE results through quality gates before deployment
- LEARN from outcomes - store patterns in
aqe/learning/*namespace
Quick Agent Selection:
- Test generation needed →
qe-test-generator - Coverage gaps →
qe-coverage-analyzer - Quality decision →
qe-quality-gate - Security scan →
qe-security-scanner - Performance test →
qe-performance-tester - Full pipeline →
qe-fleet-commander
Critical Success Factors:
- Agents amplify human expertise, not replace it
- Human-in-the-loop for critical decisions
- Measure: bugs caught, time saved, coverage improved </default_to_action>
Quick Reference Card
When to Use
- Designing autonomous testing systems
- Scaling QE with intelligent agents
- Implementing multi-agent coordination
- Building CI/CD quality pipelines
PACTS Principles
| Principle | Agent Behavior | Human Role |
|---|---|---|
| Proactive | Analyze pre-merge, predict risk | Set guardrails |
| Autonomous | Execute tests, fix flaky tests | Review critical |
| Collaborative | Multi-agent coordination | Provide context |
| Targeted | Risk-based prioritization | Define risk areas |
| Structured | Governance, observability, explainable decisions (measure confidence, not trust) | Audit behavior, set policy |
19-Agent Fleet
| Category | Agents | Primary Use |
|---|---|---|
| Core Testing (5) | test-generator, test-executor, coverage-analyzer, quality-gate, quality-analyzer | Daily testing |
| Performance/Security (2) | performance-tester, security-scanner | Non-functional |
| Strategic (3) | requirements-validator, production-intelligence, fleet-commander | Planning |
| Advanced (4) | regression-risk-analyzer, test-data-architect, api-contract-validator, flaky-test-hunter | Specialized |
| Visual/Chaos (2) | visual-tester, chaos-engineer | Edge cases |
| Deployment (1) | deployment-readiness | Release |
| Analysis (1) | code-complexity | Maintainability |
Coordination Patterns
Hierarchical: fleet-commander → [generators] → [executors] → quality-gate
Mesh: test-gen ↔ coverage ↔ quality (peer decisions)
Sequential: risk-analyzer → test-gen → executor → coverage → gate
Success Criteria
✅ 10x deployment frequency with same/better quality ✅ Coverage gaps detected in real-time ✅ Bugs caught pre-production ❌ Agents acting without human oversight on critical decisions ❌ Deploying all 19 agents at once (start with 1-2)
Core Concepts
QE Evolution
| Stage | Approach | Limitation |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional | Manual everything | Human bottleneck |
| Automation | Scripts + fixed scenarios | Needs orchestration |
| Agentic | AI agents + human judgment | Requires trust-building |
Core Premise: Agents amplify human expertise for 10x scale.
Key Capabilities
1. Intelligent Test Generation
// Agent analyzes code change, generates targeted tests
const tests = await qeTestGenerator.generate(prDiff);
// → Happy path, edge cases, error handling tests
2. Pattern Detection - Scan logs, find anomalies, correlate errors
3. Adaptive Strategy - Adjust test focus based on risk signals
4. Root Cause Analysis - Link failures to code changes, suggest fixes
Agent Coordination
Memory Namespaces
aqe/test-plan/* - Test planning decisions
aqe/coverage/* - Coverage analysis results
aqe/quality/* - Quality metrics and gates
aqe/learning/* - Patterns and Q-values
aqe/coordination/* - Cross-agent state
Memory Operations (MCP Tools)
CRITICAL: Always use aqe memory store with persist: true for learnings.
1. Store data to persistent memory:
# Store test plan decisions (persisted to .agentic-qe/memory.db)
aqe memory store \
--key "aqe/test-plan/pr-123" \
--namespace "aqe/test-plan" \
--value '{"prNumber":123,"riskLevel":"medium","requiredCoverage":85,"testTypes":["unit","integration"]}' \
--ttl 604800 \
--json
2. Retrieve prior learnings before task:
# Query patterns before starting test generation
aqe memory search \
--pattern "aqe/learning/patterns/test-generation/*" \
--namespace "aqe/learning" \
--json
3. Store coverage analysis results:
aqe memory store \
--key "aqe/coverage/auth-module" \
--namespace "aqe/coverage" \
--value '{"moduleId":"auth-module","currentCoverage":78,"gaps":["error-handling","edge-cases"],"priority":"high"}' \
--ttl 1209600 \
--json
Three-Phase Memory Protocol
For coordinated multi-agent tasks, use the STATUS → PROGRESS → COMPLETE pattern:
# PHASE 1: STATUS - Task starting
aqe memory store \
--key "aqe/coordination/task-123/status" \
--namespace "aqe/coordination" \
--value '{"status":"running","agent":"qe-test-generator"}' \
--json
# PHASE 2: PROGRESS - Intermediate updates
aqe memory store \
--key "aqe/coordination/task-123/progress" \
--namespace "aqe/coordination" \
--value '{"progress":50,"action":"generating-unit-tests","testsGenerated":25}' \
--json
# PHASE 3: COMPLETE - Task finished
aqe memory store \
--key "aqe/coordination/task-123/complete" \
--namespace "aqe/coordination" \
--value '{"status":"complete","result":"success","testsGenerated":47,"coverageAchieved":92.3}' \
--json
Blackboard Events
| Event | Trigger | Subscribers |
|---|---|---|
test:generated | New tests created | executor, coverage |
coverage:gap | Gap detected | test-generator |
quality:decision | Gate evaluated | fleet-commander |
security:finding | Vulnerability found | quality-gate |
Example: PR Quality Pipeline
// 1. Risk analysis
const risks = await Task("Analyze PR", prDiff, "qe-regression-risk-analyzer");
// 2. Generate tests for risks
const tests = await Task("Generate tests", risks, "qe-test-generator");
// 3. Execute + analyze
const results = await Task("Run tests", tests, "qe-test-executor");
const coverage = await Task("Check coverage", results, "qe-coverage-analyzer");
// 4. Quality decision
const decision = await Task("Evaluate", {results, coverage}, "qe-quality-gate");
// → GO/NO-GO with rationale
Implementation Phases
| Phase | Duration | Goal | Agent(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment | Weeks 1-4 | Validate one use case | 1 agent |
| Integrate | Months 2-3 | CI/CD pipeline | 3-4 agents |
| Scale | Months 4-6 | Multiple use cases | 8+ agents |
| Evolve | Ongoing | Continuous learning | Full fleet |
Phase 1 Example
# Week 1: Deploy single agent
aqe agent spawn qe-test-generator
# Weeks 2-3: Generate tests for 10 PRs
# Track: bugs found, test quality, review time
# Week 4: Measure impact
aqe agent metrics qe-test-generator
# → Tests: 150, Bugs: 12, Time saved: 8h
Limitations & Strengths
Agents Excel At
- Volume: Scan thousands of logs in seconds
- Patterns: Find correlations humans miss
- Tireless: 24/7 testing and monitoring
- Speed: Instant code change analysis
Agents Need Humans For
- Business context and priorities
- Ethical judgment and trade-offs
- Creative exploration ("what if" scenarios)
- Domain expertise (healthcare, finance, legal)
Best Practices
| Do | Don't |
|---|---|
| Start with one agent, one use case | Deploy all 18 at once |
| Build feedback loops early | Deploy and forget |
| Human reviews agent output | Auto-merge without review |
| Measure bugs caught, time saved | Track vanity metrics (test count) |
| Build trust gradually | Give full autonomy immediately |
Trust Progression
Month 1: Agent suggests → Human decides
Month 2: Agent acts → Human reviews after
Month 3: Agent autonomous on low-risk
Month 4: Agent handles critical with oversight
Agent Coordination Hints
coordination:
topology: hierarchical
commander: qe-fleet-commander
memory_namespace: aqe/coordination
blackboard_topic: qe-fleet
preload_skills:
- agentic-quality-engineering # Always (this skill)
- risk-based-testing # For prioritization
- quality-metrics # For measurement
agent_assignments:
qe-test-generator: [api-testing-patterns, tdd-london-chicago]
qe-coverage-analyzer: [quality-metrics, risk-based-testing]
qe-security-scanner: [security-testing, risk-based-testing]
qe-performance-tester: [performance-testing]
Related Skills
holistic-testing-pact- PACTS principles deep diverisk-based-testing- Prioritize agent focusquality-metrics- Measure agent effectivenessapi-testing-patterns,security-testing,performance-testing- Specialized testing
Resources
- Agent definitions:
.claude/agents/ - CLI:
aqe agent --help - Fleet status:
aqe fleet status
Success Metric: Deploy 10x more frequently with same or better quality through intelligent agent collaboration.
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 478
- Forks
- 92
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
qe-agentic-quality-engineering- Source
- github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe