Quality Metrics
SkillMonitoring & opsTracks quality metrics including defect density, test effectiveness ratio, DORA metrics, and mean time to detection. Use when establishing quality dashboards, defining KPIs, evaluating test suite effectiveness, or reporting quality trends to stakeholders.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Quality Metrics skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe in .claude/skills/quality-metrics/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
<default_to_action> When measuring quality or building dashboards:
- MEASURE outcomes (bug escape rate, MTTD) not activities (test count)
- AVOID vanity metrics: 100% coverage means nothing if tests don't catch bugs
- SET thresholds that drive behavior (quality gates block bad code)
- TREND over time: Direction matters more than absolute numbers </default_to_action>
Quick Reference Card
When to Use
- Building quality dashboards
- Defining quality gates
- Evaluating testing effectiveness
- Justifying quality investments
Quality Gate Thresholds
| Metric | Blocking Threshold | Warning |
|---|---|---|
| Test pass rate | 100% | - |
| Critical coverage | > 80% | > 70% |
| Security critical | 0 | - |
| Performance p95 | < 200ms | < 500ms |
| Flaky tests | < 2% | < 5% |
Dashboard Design
// Agent generates quality dashboard
await Task("Generate Dashboard", {
metrics: {
delivery: ['deployment-frequency', 'lead-time', 'change-failure-rate'],
quality: ['bug-escape-rate', 'test-effectiveness', 'defect-density'],
stability: ['mttd', 'mttr', 'availability'],
process: ['code-review-time', 'flaky-test-rate', 'coverage-trend']
},
visualization: 'grafana',
alerts: {
critical: { bug_escape_rate: '>20%', mttr: '>24h' },
warning: { coverage: '<70%', flaky_rate: '>5%' }
}
}, "qe-quality-analyzer");
Quality Gate Configuration
{
"qualityGates": {
"commit": {
"coverage": { "min": 80, "blocking": true },
"lint": { "errors": 0, "blocking": true }
},
"pr": {
"tests": { "pass": "100%", "blocking": true },
"security": { "critical": 0, "blocking": true },
"coverage_delta": { "min": 0, "blocking": false }
},
"release": {
"e2e": { "pass": "100%", "blocking": true },
"performance_p95": { "max_ms": 200, "blocking": true },
"bug_escape_rate": { "max": "10%", "blocking": false }
}
}
}
Agent-Assisted Metrics
// Calculate quality trends
await Task("Quality Trend Analysis", {
timeframe: '90d',
metrics: ['bug-escape-rate', 'mttd', 'test-effectiveness'],
compare: 'previous-90d',
predictNext: '30d'
}, "qe-quality-analyzer");
// Evaluate quality gate
await Task("Quality Gate Evaluation", {
buildId: 'build-123',
environment: 'staging',
metrics: currentMetrics,
policy: qualityPolicy
}, "qe-quality-gate");
Agent Coordination Hints
Memory Namespace
aqe/quality-metrics/
├── dashboards/* - Dashboard configurations
├── trends/* - Historical metric data
├── gates/* - Gate evaluation results
└── alerts/* - Triggered alerts
Fleet Coordination
const metricsFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
strategy: 'quality-metrics',
agents: [
'qe-quality-analyzer', // Trend analysis
'qe-test-executor', // Test metrics
'qe-coverage-analyzer', // Coverage data
'qe-production-intelligence', // Production metrics
'qe-quality-gate' // Gate decisions
],
topology: 'mesh'
});
Related Skills
- agentic-quality-engineering - Agent coordination
- cicd-pipeline-qe-orchestrator - Quality gates
- risk-based-testing - Risk-informed metrics
- shift-right-testing - Production metrics
Remember
With Agents: Agents track metrics automatically, analyze trends, trigger alerts, and make gate decisions. Use agents to maintain continuous quality visibility.
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 475
- Forks
- 91
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
quality-metrics- Source
- github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe