rca:ci
SkillMonitoring & opsRoot cause analysis from CI logs - systematic investigation when only CI output is available
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the rca:ci skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by rossoctl/rossoctl in .claude/skills/rca:ci/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Systematic root cause analysis when you only have access to CI logs and artifacts.
Context-Safe Execution (MANDATORY)
CI logs are the single largest source of context pollution. A single gh run view --log-failed
can dump thousands of lines into context. ALL CI log analysis MUST happen in subagents.
# Session-scoped log directory
# Works in both Claude Code (local) and sandbox agent (container)
export LOG_DIR="${LOG_DIR:-${WORKSPACE_DIR:-/tmp}/rossoctl-rca}"
mkdir -p "$LOG_DIR"
Rules:
- Download CI logs to files — never let
gh run view --log-failedoutput hit the context - ALL log analysis in subagents — use
Task(subagent_type='Explore')to read and analyze - The subagent reads the file, finds errors, and returns a concise summary
- Main context only sees: file paths, exit codes, and subagent summaries
rca:ci vs rca:hypershift
| Aspect | rca:ci | rca:hypershift |
|---|---|---|
| Access | CI logs only | Full cluster access |
| Data | Static artifacts | Live state + logs |
| When | CI failure, no cluster | Have running cluster |
| Escalate | → rca:hypershift if need live debugging | N/A |
When to Use
- CI pipeline failed
- No HyperShift cluster available
- Need to understand failure before deciding on fix
- Before using
tdd:cito iterate on fixes
Auto-approved:
ghcommands for downloading CI logs and artifacts are auto-approved. Analysis output is saved to/tmp/rossoctl/rca/.
RCA Workflow
flowchart TD
START(["/rca:ci"]) --> P1["Phase 1: Gather"]:::rca
P1 --> P2["Phase 2: Isolate"]:::rca
P2 --> P3["Phase 3: Hypothesize"]:::rca
P3 --> P4["Phase 4: Verify"]:::rca
P4 --> RESULT{"Conclusive?"}
RESULT -->|Yes| P5["Phase 5: Document"]:::rca
RESULT -->|No| ESC["Escalate to rca:hypershift"]:::rca
P5 --> TDD["tdd:ci"]:::tdd
classDef rca fill:#FF5722,stroke:#333,color:white
classDef tdd fill:#4CAF50,stroke:#333,color:white
Follow this diagram as the workflow.
Phase 1: Gather CI Artifacts
# Get failed run ID (small output, OK inline)
gh run list --status failure --limit 5
# Download logs to session-scoped directory
gh run view <run-id> --log-failed > $LOG_DIR/ci-run-<run-id>.log 2>&1; echo "EXIT:$?"
# View in browser (minimal context — just prints URL)
gh run view <run-id> --web
# Download all artifacts to session-scoped directory
gh run download <run-id> -D $LOG_DIR/artifacts
Analyze logs in subagent — use Task(subagent_type='Explore') to read $LOG_DIR/ci-run-<run-id>.log.
Phase 2: Isolate the Failure
Do this in a subagent — use Task(subagent_type='Explore') with instructions to:
- Use
Grepwith context (-C 3) on$LOG_DIR/ci-run-<run-id>.log— do NOT read the whole file - Search patterns:
FAILED|ERROR|AssertionError|assert.*Falsewithhead_limit: 30 - If grep finds matches, read only those specific line ranges for context
- Return: first error, test name, assertion message, and 2-3 lines of surrounding context
Error Chain Analysis
Work backwards from the failure:
- What test failed?
- What assertion failed?
- What was the actual vs expected value?
- What API/operation produced the wrong result?
- What component is responsible?
Phase 3: Hypothesize Causes
Common CI Failure Categories
| Category | Signs | Check |
|---|---|---|
| Timing | "timeout", flaky results | Race conditions, slow startup |
| Config | "not found", "invalid" | Missing env vars, wrong paths |
| Auth | "401", "403", "unauthorized" | Token issues, client config |
| Network | "connection refused", "timeout" | Service not ready, DNS |
| State | Works locally, fails CI | Order dependency, cleanup |
| Resource | "OOM", "evicted" | Memory/CPU limits |
Hypothesis Template
## Hypothesis 1: [Brief description]
- **Likelihood**: High/Medium/Low
- **Evidence needed**: [What to look for]
- **Found**: [Yes/No/Partial]
- **Conclusion**: [Confirmed/Eliminated/Inconclusive]
Phase 4: Verify with Evidence
Search Patterns
# Auth issues
grep -i "oauth\|token\|401\|403\|unauthorized" logs/*.txt
# Timing issues
grep -i "timeout\|timed out\|deadline\|retry" logs/*.txt
# Connection issues
grep -i "connection\|refused\|unreachable\|dns" logs/*.txt
# Resource issues
grep -i "oom\|memory\|evict\|limit" logs/*.txt
Cross-Reference
- Compare with last successful run
- Check if same test passed before
- Look for recent code changes in affected area
Phase 5: Document Findings
## Root Cause Analysis
**Failure**: [Test name / description]
**Run ID**: [gh run id]
### Root Cause
[Clear statement of what caused the failure]
### Evidence
1. [Log line / artifact showing the issue]
2. [Supporting evidence]
### Contributing Factors
- [Any secondary causes]
### Fix
[Proposed solution]
### Prevention
[How to prevent recurrence]
CVE Check Before Publishing Findings
Before posting RCA findings to any public destination (issue comment, PR comment, etc.):
If the root cause involves a dependency bug, unexpected behavior, or version issue:
- Invoke
cve:scanto check if this is a known CVE - If a CVE is found → invoke
cve:brainstormBEFORE documenting findings publicly - Rewrite RCA documentation to use neutral language (no CVE IDs, no vulnerability descriptions)
- Report the CVE through proper channels (see
cve:brainstorm)
Example neutral RCA wording:
Root Cause: Incompatibility with <package> <version>.
Fix: Bump to <version> which resolves the behavior.
NOT:
Root Cause: CVE-2026-XXXXX in <package> allows remote code execution.
Escalation to rca:hypershift
Escalate when:
- Logs are insufficient to determine root cause
- Need to inspect live state (secrets, configs, pod status)
- Need to reproduce with debugging enabled
- Multiple hypotheses remain after log analysis
rca:ci inconclusive? → Create cluster → rca:hypershift
gh CLI Flag Reference (use ONLY these — do NOT invent flags)
gh run list
Valid: --branch <name>, --status <state>, --event <type>, --limit <n>,
--workflow <name>, --json <fields>, --commit <sha>
INVALID (do NOT use): --head, --head-ref, --pr, --pull-request
To filter by PR: use gh pr checks <pr-number> or --branch <pr-branch-name>
gh run view <run_id>
Valid: --log, --log-failed, --job <id>, --web
Always redirect large output: gh run view <id> --log-failed > $LOG_DIR/ci.log
gh pr
gh pr checks <number>— CI status for a specific PRgh pr view <number> --json checks— JSON CI check datagh pr list --state open|closed|merged
If a flag fails
Run gh <command> --help to see valid flags. Do NOT guess.
Quick Reference
| Task | Command |
|---|---|
| List failed runs | gh run list --status failure --limit 5 |
| CI for specific PR | gh pr checks <pr-number> |
| View failed logs | gh run view <id> --log-failed |
| Download artifacts | gh run download <id> |
| Open in browser | gh run view <id> --web |
Related Skills
rca:hypershift- RCA with live cluster accesstdd:ci- Fix iteration after RCAsuperpowers:systematic-debugging- General debugging approachcve:scan- CVE scanning (check if root cause is a known CVE)cve:brainstorm- Disclosure planning (if CVE found during RCA)
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 300
- Forks
- 107
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
rca-ci- Source
- github.com/rossoctl/rossoctl