Secure Software Engineering

Build security into decisions before defects reach production. This is a prevention-oriented workflow, not a claim that a design or release is secure. Record assumptions, the evidence collected, residual risks, and the owner of any accepted exception.

When To Use

Use this skill to answer "How do we build this securely?" for a new feature, integration, service, API, tenant boundary, AI capability, or release. Start early and revisit affected decisions when architecture, data flows, dependencies, or threats change.

Do not use it for an authorized post-build assessment: use security-audit-methodology. Do not use it as a vulnerability scanner for an existing codebase; use an authorized scanning tool or specialist security assessment. Use spec-driven-development when the task is to formalize the resulting requirements and phase gates, and verification-methodology to make evidence-backed completion claims.

When not to use

Use multi-tenant-saas-architecture for the end-to-end tenant model, control/application-plane placement, commercial lifecycle, and SaaS operating architecture; this skill owns the threat model and enforceable isolation controls. Use capacity-and-cost-engineering for quantitative tenant demand, quota sizing, fairness, load/soak evidence, and unit-cost tradeoffs. Route privacy lifecycle and deletion-verification artifacts to privacy-engineering.

Workflow

1. Requirements: identify assets, actors, harm, data classifications, regulatory or contractual constraints, and security outcomes. Write testable acceptance criteria before selecting controls.
2. Threat model: map data flows and trust boundaries; state assumptions, abuse cases, mitigations, and residual risk. STRIDE is optional vocabulary, not an exhaustive method.
3. Design: choose controls that fit the trust model, including server-side authorization, data isolation, safe failure behavior, and AI capability boundaries. Explain rejected alternatives.
4. Implement: make each boundary enforceable in code and configuration; protect input, output, credentials, dependencies, logs, and operational paths.
5. Review and release: verify controls with direct evidence, review changes for bypasses, preserve release evidence, and feed incidents or near misses into requirements and tests.

Loop to the affected phase when evidence contradicts an assumption or a design changes. Stop when each material decision has an accountable owner, direct evidence or an explicit gap, and a disposition for residual risk.

Reference Files

Load when	File
You need a version-pinned source and its decision use	references/source-index.md
Defining assets, boundaries, abuse cases, or security criteria	references/security-requirements-threat-modeling.md
Choosing identity, sessions, permissions, or service access	references/authentication-authorization.md
Handling requests, files, URLs, serialized data, output, or AI content	references/input-validation-data-handling.md
Adding a key, token, credential, or signing material	references/secrets-lifecycle.md
Adding, updating, building, or publishing dependencies	references/dependency-supply-chain.md
Designing logs, audit events, monitoring, or forensic evidence	references/secure-logging-audit.md
Sharing infrastructure or data across tenants, including control/application planes, tenant context, support access, or tenant lifecycle proof	references/multi-tenant-isolation.md
Reviewing a change or defining a security review gate	references/secure-code-review.md
Preparing artifacts, exceptions, rollback, or response for release	references/release-evidence.md; load release-engineering to carry those controls and evidence through build, registry, promotion, and deployment gates
Learning from an incident, near miss, or escaped defect	references/incident-learning.md
Designing an LLM, RAG pipeline, model integration, or agent tool	references/ai-llm-security.md

Templates

Use when	File
Starting a feature or system threat model	templates/lightweight-threat-model.md
Writing security acceptance criteria for a specification or change	templates/security-acceptance-criteria.md
Reviewing a security-relevant code change	templates/secure-code-review-checklist.md

Guardrails

• Treat prompts, retrieved content, tool output, webhooks, files, and client-provided identity or tenant fields as untrusted until a boundary validates them.
• A framework, scan, SBOM, signature, provenance attestation, or checklist is evidence about a limited claim, not proof that software is safe.
• Do not make a control universal: authentication protocols depend on the trust model; row-level security is one isolation mechanism; secret rotation follows events and risk; controls need verification in their actual deployment.
• Keep completed threat models and security acceptance criteria confidential when they expose system boundaries or weaknesses. Use placeholders, never real credentials or private deployment details.

Portability

Use the host environment's normal mechanisms to create artifacts, run tests, and obtain approvals. Do not assume a vendor, cloud, identity provider, database, CI system, or deployment topology.