Security Testing
SkillDatabases & dataScans for security vulnerabilities including XSS, SQL injection, CSRF, and auth flaws using OWASP Top 10 methodology. Use when conducting SAST/DAST scans, auditing authentication flows, testing authorization rules, or implementing security test automation.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Security Testing skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe in .claude/skills/security-testing/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
<default_to_action> When testing security or conducting audits:
- TEST OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities systematically
- VALIDATE authentication and authorization on every endpoint
- SCAN dependencies for known vulnerabilities (npm audit)
- CHECK for injection attacks (SQL, XSS, command)
- VERIFY secrets aren't exposed in code/logs
Quick Security Checks:
- Access control → Test horizontal/vertical privilege escalation
- Crypto → Verify password hashing, HTTPS, no sensitive data exposed
- Injection → Test SQL injection, XSS, command injection
- Auth → Test weak passwords, session fixation, MFA enforcement
- Config → Check error messages don't leak info
Critical Success Factors:
- Think like an attacker, build like a defender
- Security is built in, not added at the end
- Test continuously in CI/CD, not just before release </default_to_action>
Quick Reference Card
When to Use
- Security audits and penetration testing
- Testing authentication/authorization
- Validating input sanitization
- Reviewing security configuration
OWASP Top 10 (2021)
| # | Vulnerability | Key Test |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Broken Access Control | User A accessing User B's data |
| 2 | Cryptographic Failures | Plaintext passwords, HTTP |
| 3 | Injection | SQL/XSS/command injection |
| 4 | Insecure Design | Rate limiting, session timeout |
| 5 | Security Misconfiguration | Verbose errors, exposed /admin |
| 6 | Vulnerable Components | npm audit, outdated packages |
| 7 | Auth Failures | Weak passwords, no MFA |
| 8 | Integrity Failures | Unsigned updates, malware |
| 9 | Logging Failures | No audit trail for breaches |
| 10 | SSRF | Server fetching internal URLs |
Tools
| Type | Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| SAST | SonarQube, Semgrep | Static code analysis |
| DAST | OWASP ZAP, Burp | Dynamic scanning |
| Deps | npm audit, Snyk | Dependency vulnerabilities |
| Secrets | git-secrets, TruffleHog | Secret scanning |
Agent Coordination
qe-security-scanner: Multi-layer SAST/DAST scanningqe-api-contract-validator: API security testingqe-quality-analyzer: Security code review
Key Vulnerability Tests
1. Broken Access Control
// Horizontal escalation - User A accessing User B's data
test('user cannot access another user\'s order', async () => {
const userAToken = await login('userA');
const userBOrder = await createOrder('userB');
const response = await api.get(`/orders/${userBOrder.id}`, {
headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${userAToken}` }
});
expect(response.status).toBe(403);
});
// Vertical escalation - Regular user accessing admin
test('regular user cannot access admin', async () => {
const userToken = await login('regularUser');
expect((await api.get('/admin/users', {
headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${userToken}` }
})).status).toBe(403);
});
2. Injection Attacks
// SQL Injection
test('prevents SQL injection', async () => {
const malicious = "' OR '1'='1";
const response = await api.get(`/products?search=${malicious}`);
expect(response.body.length).toBeLessThan(100); // Not all products
});
// XSS
test('sanitizes HTML output', async () => {
const xss = '<script>alert("XSS")</script>';
await api.post('/comments', { text: xss });
const html = (await api.get('/comments')).body;
expect(html).toContain('<script>');
expect(html).not.toContain('<script>');
});
3. Cryptographic Failures
test('passwords are hashed', async () => {
await db.users.create({ email: 'test@example.com', password: 'MyPassword123' });
const user = await db.users.findByEmail('test@example.com');
expect(user.password).not.toBe('MyPassword123');
expect(user.password).toMatch(/^\$2[aby]\$\d{2}\$/); // bcrypt
});
test('no sensitive data in API response', async () => {
const response = await api.get('/users/me');
expect(response.body).not.toHaveProperty('password');
expect(response.body).not.toHaveProperty('ssn');
});
4. Security Misconfiguration
test('errors don\'t leak sensitive info', async () => {
const response = await api.post('/login', { email: 'nonexistent@test.com', password: 'wrong' });
expect(response.body.error).toBe('Invalid credentials'); // Generic message
});
test('sensitive endpoints not exposed', async () => {
const endpoints = ['/debug', '/.env', '/.git', '/admin'];
for (let ep of endpoints) {
expect((await fetch(`https://example.com${ep}`)).status).not.toBe(200);
}
});
5. Rate Limiting
test('rate limiting prevents brute force', async () => {
const responses = [];
for (let i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
responses.push(await api.post('/login', { email: 'test@example.com', password: 'wrong' }));
}
expect(responses.filter(r => r.status === 429).length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
});
Security Checklist
Authentication
- Strong password requirements (12+ chars)
- Password hashing (bcrypt, scrypt, Argon2)
- MFA for sensitive operations
- Account lockout after failed attempts
- Session ID changes after login
- Session timeout
Authorization
- Check authorization on every request
- Least privilege principle
- No horizontal escalation
- No vertical escalation
Data Protection
- HTTPS everywhere
- Encrypted at rest
- Secrets not in code/logs
- PII compliance (GDPR)
Input Validation
- Server-side validation
- Parameterized queries (no SQL injection)
- Output encoding (no XSS)
- Rate limiting
CI/CD Integration
# GitHub Actions
security-checks:
steps:
- name: Dependency audit
run: npm audit --audit-level=high
- name: SAST scan
run: npm run sast
- name: Secret scan
uses: trufflesecurity/trufflehog@main
- name: DAST scan
if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'
run: docker run owasp/zap2docker-stable zap-baseline.py -t https://staging.example.com
Pre-commit hooks:
#!/bin/sh
git-secrets --scan
npm run lint:security
Agent-Assisted Security Testing
// Comprehensive multi-layer scan
await Task("Security Scan", {
target: 'src/',
layers: { sast: true, dast: true, dependencies: true, secrets: true },
severity: ['critical', 'high', 'medium']
}, "qe-security-scanner");
// OWASP Top 10 testing
await Task("OWASP Scan", {
categories: ['broken-access-control', 'injection', 'cryptographic-failures'],
depth: 'comprehensive'
}, "qe-security-scanner");
// Validate fix
await Task("Validate Fix", {
vulnerability: 'CVE-2024-12345',
expectedResolution: 'upgrade package to v2.0.0',
retestAfterFix: true
}, "qe-security-scanner");
Agent Coordination Hints
Memory Namespace
aqe/security/
├── scans/* - Scan results
├── vulnerabilities/* - Found vulnerabilities
├── fixes/* - Remediation tracking
└── compliance/* - Compliance status
Fleet Coordination
const securityFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
strategy: 'security-testing',
agents: [
'qe-security-scanner',
'qe-api-contract-validator',
'qe-quality-analyzer',
'qe-deployment-readiness'
],
topology: 'parallel'
});
Common Mistakes
❌ Security by Obscurity
Hiding admin at /super-secret-admin → Use proper auth
❌ Client-Side Validation Only
JavaScript validation can be bypassed → Always validate server-side
❌ Trusting User Input
Assuming input is safe → Sanitize, validate, escape all input
❌ Hardcoded Secrets
API keys in code → Environment variables, secret management
Compliance & Agent CLI
For v3 agent-specific commands (aqe security ...), SAST/DAST scanning code, compliance audits (SOC2/GDPR/HIPAA), secret detection, and security gates, see references/compliance-agent-commands.md.
Related Skills
- agentic-quality-engineering - Security with agents
- api-testing-patterns - API security testing
- compliance-testing - GDPR, HIPAA, SOC2
Remember
Think like an attacker: What would you try to break? Test that. Build like a defender: Assume input is malicious until proven otherwise. Test continuously: Security testing is ongoing, not one-time.
With Agents: Agents automate vulnerability scanning, track remediation, and validate fixes. Use agents to maintain security posture at scale.
Run History
After each security scan, append results to run-history.json in this skill directory:
node -e "
const fs = require('fs');
const h = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync('.claude/skills/security-testing/run-history.json'));
h.runs.push({date: new Date().toISOString().split('T')[0], scan_types: ['sast','deps'], findings: {critical: 0, high: 0, medium: 0, low: 0}});
fs.writeFileSync('.claude/skills/security-testing/run-history.json', JSON.stringify(h, null, 2));
"
Read run-history.json before each scan — track finding count by severity over time. Alert if critical findings increase.
Skill Composition
- During code review → Use with
/code-review-qualityfor combined quality + security review - Validate findings → Use
/pentest-validationto prove exploitability - Compliance → Use
/compliance-testingfor regulatory requirements
Gotchas
npm auditmay report false positives for dev dependencies — filter with--omit=devfor production-relevant results- Agent may skip DAST in favor of faster SAST-only scans — explicitly request both if needed
- security-compliance domain has 100% success rate — use as model for other skill reliability
- When scanning dependencies, check both direct and transitive —
npm audit --allcatches nested vulnerabilities
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 478
- Forks
- 92
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
security-testing-proffesor-for-testing- Source
- github.com/proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe