skill-context-detection
SkillProductivityAuto-detect work context (Dev vs Knowledge) — use to tailor workflows based on current task type
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the skill-context-detection skill
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by nyldn/claude-octopus in skills/skill-context-detection/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Host: Codex CLI — This skill was designed for Claude Code and adapted for Codex. Cross-reference commands use installed skill names in Codex rather than
/octo:*slash commands. Use the active Codex shell and subagent tools. Do not claim a provider, model, or host subagent is available until the current session exposes it. For host tool equivalents, seeskills/blocks/codex-host-adapter.md.
Context Detection - Internal Skill
Purpose
This skill provides automatic context detection to determine whether the user is working in a Development context (code-focused) or Knowledge context (research/strategy-focused). This replaces the manual /octo:km toggle with intelligent auto-detection.
Detection Algorithm
When a workflow skill activates, detect context using these signals:
Step 1: Check for Explicit Override
If user has explicitly set mode via /octo:km on or /octo:km off, respect that setting.
# Check if knowledge mode is explicitly set
if [[ -f ~/.claude-octopus/config/knowledge-mode ]]; then
EXPLICIT_MODE=$(cat ~/.claude-octopus/config/knowledge-mode)
if [[ "$EXPLICIT_MODE" == "on" ]]; then
echo "knowledge"
exit 0
elif [[ "$EXPLICIT_MODE" == "off" ]]; then
echo "dev"
exit 0
fi
fi
# If "auto" or not set, proceed with auto-detection
Step 2: Analyze Prompt Content (Strongest Signal)
Knowledge Context Indicators (check prompt for these terms):
- Business/strategy: "market", "ROI", "stakeholders", "strategy", "business case", "competitive"
- Research: "literature", "synthesis", "academic", "papers", "research question"
- UX: "personas", "user research", "journey map", "pain points", "interviews"
- Deliverables: "presentation", "report", "PRD", "proposal", "executive summary"
Dev Context Indicators (check prompt for these terms):
- Technical: "API", "endpoint", "database", "function", "class", "module"
- Actions: "implement", "debug", "refactor", "test", "deploy", "build"
- Artifacts: "code", "tests", "migration", "schema", "controller"
Scoring:
- Count knowledge indicators in prompt
- Count dev indicators in prompt
- Higher count wins
- If tied, check project context (Step 3)
Step 3: Analyze Project Context (Secondary Signal)
Dev Project Indicators:
- Has
package.json,Cargo.toml,go.mod,pyproject.toml,pom.xml - Has
src/,lib/,app/directories with code files - Recent files are
.ts,.js,.py,.go,.rs,.java
Knowledge Project Indicators:
- Has
docs/,research/,strategy/,reports/directories - Majority of files are
.md,.docx,.pdf,.pptx - No code package managers detected
Step 4: Default Fallback
If signals are ambiguous or equal:
- In a git repo with code files → Default to Dev Context
- No code files detected → Default to Knowledge Context
Context Output Format
Return detected context as a structured object for use by workflow skills:
{
"context": "dev" | "knowledge",
"confidence": "high" | "medium" | "low",
"signals": {
"prompt_indicators": ["API", "endpoint", "database"],
"project_type": "node_typescript",
"explicit_override": false
}
}
How Workflow Skills Use Context
flow-discover (Research)
| Aspect | Dev Context | Knowledge Context |
|---|---|---|
| Research Focus | Technical implementation, library comparison, code patterns | Market analysis, academic synthesis, competitive research |
| Primary Agents | Codex (implementation), Antigravity (ecosystem) | Antigravity (analysis), research-synthesizer |
| Output Format | Code examples, API comparisons, tech recommendations | Reports, frameworks, strategic recommendations |
| Visual Banner | 🔍 [Dev] Discover Phase: Technical research | 🔍 [Knowledge] Discover Phase: Strategic research |
flow-develop (Build)
| Aspect | Dev Context | Knowledge Context |
|---|---|---|
| Build Focus | Code generation, implementation, architecture | PRDs, strategy docs, presentations |
| Primary Agents | Codex (code), backend-architect, tdd-orchestrator | product-writer, strategy-analyst, exec-communicator |
| Output Format | Source files, tests, migrations | Documents, frameworks, action plans |
| Visual Banner | 🛠️ [Dev] Develop Phase: Building code | 🛠️ [Knowledge] Develop Phase: Building deliverables |
flow-deliver (Review)
| Aspect | Dev Context | Knowledge Context |
|---|---|---|
| Review Focus | Code quality, security, performance | Document quality, argument strength, completeness |
| Primary Agents | code-reviewer, security-auditor | exec-communicator, strategy-analyst |
| Quality Gates | OWASP, test coverage, maintainability | Evidence quality, clarity, actionability |
| Visual Banner | ✅ [Dev] Deliver Phase: Code review | ✅ [Knowledge] Deliver Phase: Document review |
Visual Indicator Update
When context is detected, update the visual banner to show context:
Dev Context:
🐙 **CLAUDE OCTOPUS ACTIVATED** - Multi-provider research mode
🔍 [Dev] Discover Phase: Researching OAuth implementation patterns
Providers:
🔴 Codex CLI - Technical implementation analysis
🟡 Antigravity CLI - Ecosystem and library comparison
🔵 Claude - Strategic synthesis
Knowledge Context:
🐙 **CLAUDE OCTOPUS ACTIVATED** - Multi-provider research mode
🔍 [Knowledge] Discover Phase: Researching market entry strategies
Providers:
🔴 Codex CLI - Data analysis and modeling
🟡 Antigravity CLI - Market and competitive research
🔵 Claude - Strategic synthesis
Implementation in Workflow Skills
Each flow skill should:
- Before executing workflow, run context detection
- Show detected context in visual banner
- Adjust behavior based on context:
- Agent selection
- Prompt framing for external CLIs
- Output format expectations
- Quality gate criteria
Example Integration (Pseudocode)
When this skill activates:
1. **Detect context**
- Analyze user's prompt for knowledge vs dev indicators
- Check project type (code repo vs doc-heavy)
- Check for explicit override (~/.claude-octopus/config/knowledge-mode)
- Determine: "dev" or "knowledge" with confidence level
2. **Show context-aware banner**
🐙 CLAUDE OCTOPUS ACTIVATED - Multi-provider [research|implementation|validation] mode [Phase Emoji] [Context] [Phase Name]: [Description]
Detected Context: [Dev|Knowledge] (confidence: [high|medium|low])
3. **Execute workflow with context-appropriate behavior**
- Frame prompts for external providers based on context
- Select appropriate synthesis approach
- Apply context-specific quality gates
Override Mechanism
Users can still explicitly set context when auto-detection is wrong:
# Force knowledge mode
/octo:km on
# Force dev mode
/octo:km off
# Return to auto-detection
/octo:km auto
When explicit override is set, context detection respects it until user resets to "auto".
Confidence Levels
- High: Strong signals in prompt AND project context agree
- Medium: Signals in prompt OR project context (not both)
- Low: Ambiguous signals, using fallback default
When confidence is "low", consider briefly mentioning the detected context to user:
"I detected this as a [dev/knowledge] task. If that's wrong, you can use
/octo:kmto override."
Testing Context Detection
To verify context detection is working:
- In a code repository, ask "octo research caching patterns" → Should detect Dev Context
- In same repo, ask "octo research market opportunities" → Should detect Knowledge Context
- With
/octo:km onset, ask "octo research API patterns" → Should use Knowledge Context (explicit override)
Proactive Skill Suggestions
When detecting the user's work stage, surface relevant command suggestions:
| Detected Context | Suggestion |
|---|---|
| Brainstorming / exploring ideas | Consider /octo:brainstorm for structured ideation |
| Reviewing a plan or strategy | Consider /octo:plan for strategic planning |
| Debugging errors or failures | Consider /octo:debug for systematic investigation |
| Writing or running tests | Consider /octo:tdd for test-driven development |
| Code review before merge | Use Claude-native /review for ordinary review; suggest /octo:review for multi-AI escalation |
| Ready to deploy or ship | Consider /octo:deliver for quality-gated delivery |
| Researching a topic | Consider /octo:research for multi-source synthesis |
| Working on security | Use Claude-native /security-review for ordinary security review; suggest /octo:security for escalated OWASP or adversarial audit |
Suggestion Format
Suggestions should be non-intrusive, appended as a brief note:
💡 Tip: You appear to be debugging — `/octo:debug` provides systematic investigation with multi-AI support.
Persistent Opt-Out
- If user says "stop suggesting" or "no more tips": set
OCTO_PROACTIVE_SUGGESTIONS=offin.claude-octopus/preferences.json - If user says "be proactive" or "turn on tips": set
OCTO_PROACTIVE_SUGGESTIONS=on - Check preference at suggestion time — never suggest when opted out
- Respect current mode: dev mode suggestions differ from knowledge work suggestions
Re-Enable Suggestions
Users who previously opted out can re-enable suggestions at any time:
- Say "be proactive", "turn on tips", or "enable suggestions"
- Manually edit
~/.claude-octopus/preferences.jsonand setOCTO_PROACTIVE_SUGGESTIONStoon - Default state (no preference set) is suggestions enabled
Detection Signals
Detect work stage from:
- Recent tool usage (many Bash calls = likely implementing/debugging)
- File types being edited (.test.ts = testing, .md = documentation)
- Error patterns in recent output (stack traces = debugging)
- Git state (uncommitted changes = implementing, clean tree = ready to review/ship)
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 4k
- Forks
- 380
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
skill-context-detection- Source
- github.com/nyldn/claude-octopus