skill-native-escalation-routing

SkillSecurity

Use when choosing native or multi-LLM handling for init, review, or security requests

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the skill-native-escalation-routing skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by nyldn/claude-octopus in skills/skill-native-escalation-routing/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

Host: Codex CLI — This skill was designed for Claude Code and adapted for Codex. Cross-reference commands use installed skill names in Codex rather than /octo:* slash commands. Use the active Codex shell and subagent tools. Do not claim a provider, model, or host subagent is available until the current session exposes it. For host tool equivalents, see skills/blocks/codex-host-adapter.md.

Native-First Escalation Routing

Use this skill when the user asks for repository initialization, code review, or security review and it is not yet clear whether Claude-native behavior is sufficient or whether Octopus escalation is warranted.

Core Policy

Claude-native first:

  • /init
  • /review
  • /security-review

Octopus for escalation:

  • /octo:review
  • /octo:security
  • /octo:debate
  • /octo:multi

Route to Claude-Native First

Prefer Claude-native behavior when all of the following are true:

  • the request maps directly to init, review, or security review
  • the user did not ask for multiple model opinions
  • the user did not ask for Codex, Antigravity, or another provider explicitly
  • the task does not require adversarial debate, consensus scoring, or external-provider specialization

Examples:

  • "initialize this repo"
  • "review my staged changes"
  • "security review this auth module"

Escalate to Octopus

Escalate when the user asks for or clearly benefits from:

  • multiple model opinions
  • adversarial review
  • debate between providers
  • provider-specific analysis
  • autonomous codegen verification
  • elevated rigor for complex or high-risk work

Examples:

  • "get multiple model opinions on this PR"
  • "have Codex and Antigravity review this architecture"
  • "do an adversarial security review"
  • "verify this AI-generated implementation before merge"

Execution Guidance

  • If Claude-native is sufficient, do not wrap the task in Octopus unnecessarily.
  • If the user explicitly invokes /octo:review or /octo:security, treat that as an escalation request.
  • If the request is ambiguous, prefer Claude-native first and mention Octopus as the escalation path.

Suggested User Framing

Use wording like:

Claude-native first, Octopus for escalation. Use Claude-native /review or /security-review for ordinary requests. Use Octopus when you want multiple model opinions, adversarial review, or stricter multi-LLM workflows.

Signals

GitHub stars
4k
Forks
380
Last commit
Sep 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
skill-native-escalation-routing
Source
github.com/nyldn/claude-octopus