The Snowball Method

SkillProductivity

Use when turning a single topic into a full content plan with multiple angles, formats, and a publishing calendar. Triggers on "content plan", "content calendar", "snowball method", "turn one topic into many posts", "content multiplication", "30 days of content", "content from one idea".

Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.

Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.

Then ask your AI: use the The Snowball Method skill

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by harperreed/dotfiles in .claude/skills-archive/snowball-content/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

Turn 1 topic into 40+ content pieces across platforms using a 4-prompt sequential pipeline.

The Pipeline

This is a sequential 4-prompt process. Each prompt builds on the previous output. Do NOT skip steps or combine them.

digraph snowball {
  rankdir=TB;
  core [label="Prompt 1: THE CORE\nAsk clarifying questions FIRST\nthen define the core problem"];
  angles [label="Prompt 2: ANGLES & HEADLINES\n7 unexpected angles from core\neach with hooks, facts, controversy"];
  branches [label="Prompt 3: BRANCHES\n3 subtopics per angle\n3 formats per subtopic"];
  calendar [label="Prompt 4: 30-DAY CALENDAR\nPlatform-adapted posts\nwith metrics and distribution"];

  core -> angles;
  angles -> branches;
  branches -> calendar;
}

Prompt 1: THE CORE

You MUST ask clarifying questions before producing output. Do not skip this.

Ask about:

  • Goal (what outcome does this content serve?)
  • Target audience (who specifically?)
  • Pain points (what keeps them up at night?)
  • Constraints (budget, team size, tools available?)
  • Tone (professional, casual, provocative, educational?)
  • Platforms (Threads, Reels, TikTok, LinkedIn, email, YouTube?)

After receiving answers, deliver:

DeliverableSpec
Core problemOne specific problem people discuss and share
Why it matters2-3 sharp sentences
30-day content goalsMeasurable outcomes (saves, leads, shares — not vanity metrics)
ICP tableSee format below

ICP Table Format:

WhoWhat they wantWhat blocks themTheir languageTriggersTaboos

Be specific. Generic personas ("busy professionals") fail. Use language the audience actually uses.

Prompt 2: ANGLES & HEADLINES

Generate 7 unexpected angles from the core problem. Each angle must be:

  • Counterintuitive, OR
  • "You're doing it wrong", OR
  • Myth vs reality, OR
  • Hidden cost of the usual solution

For each angle, provide ALL of these:

ElementConstraint
2 hooksEach ≤12 words, platform-ready (Threads/Reels)
1 core insight≤80 words
1 number/factWith source citation — see Credibility Gate below
1 controversial statementDesigned to spark comments

Credibility Gate (mandatory for every angle's number/fact):

Write exactly one line in this form:

Source: [publication/study/author, year] — [one-sentence fact]

Fail condition: If no verifiable source exists for the claimed fact, the angle is blocked. Do not proceed with that angle until a real source is supplied. Generate a replacement angle if needed.

The 7 angles must not overlap. If two angles feel similar, cut one and find something sharper.

Prompt 3: BRANCHES

For each of the 7 angles, create 3 subtopics. Each subtopic must pass the Cliche Inversion Gate before proceeding:

Cliche Inversion Gate (mandatory for every subtopic):

  1. Write a one-sentence "Obvious Version" — the cliche take a mediocre writer would produce on this subtopic.
  2. Write a one-sentence "Inversion Statement" in this exact form: "Unlike [obvious version], this subtopic argues/shows [specific contradiction]."
  3. If the Inversion Statement cannot be completed with a concrete contradiction (a negation like "not X" does not count — it must assert something specific and different), the subtopic is rejected. Generate a replacement and repeat.

Show both sentences inline before presenting each subtopic's formats. A reviewer must be able to verify the gate passed without knowing the method.

For each subtopic that passes the gate, create 3 formats:

Format 1: Educational

  • Hook (≤2 lines)
  • Insight (≤80 words)
  • 3 concrete "do this today" steps

Format 2: Provocative

  • Debatable hook
  • 3 supporting proofs
  • Question at the end (drives comments)

Format 3: Case Study

  • Context (situation before)
  • Action (what changed)
  • Numbers (measurable result)
  • Takeaway (one sentence)

If data is missing for case studies, ask the user — do not fabricate numbers.

Prompt 4: 30-DAY CALENDAR

For each piece of content from Prompt 3, adapt for the user's specified platforms:

  • Adjust length per platform norms
  • Specify visual format (carousel, reel, text post, thread, etc.)
  • Include a CTA appropriate to the platform
  • Define a success metric for each post

Build the calendar as a table:

DatePlatformTopicAngleFormatGoal/MetricDistribution Notes

Calendar rules:

  • Remove repetition — no two posts should feel like the same take
  • Alternate topics to avoid audience fatigue
  • Note repurposing opportunities (clips, carousels from long-form, etc.)
  • Front-load problem-awareness content, back-load solution content

Common Mistakes

MistakeFix
Generic angles"5 tips for X" is not an angle. Push for counterintuitive, myth-busting, or hidden-cost framing.
Inversion Statement that merely negates"Unlike X, this shows not-X" fails the gate. The contradiction must assert something specific.

Signals

GitHub stars
332
Forks
47
Last commit
Sep 2026
Advanced
Catalog kind
skill
Gateway key
snowball-content
Source
github.com/harperreed/dotfiles