Spark Report
SkillDocs & knowledgeLets your agent turn notes, links, or research into a polished report page with summary, sections, tables, and citations.
Use Spark Report in Claude, ChatGPT or Ahel Desktop
Free. Sign in, add Spark Report and connect your AI. About a minute.
Also: Claude Code · Cursor · Codex
Then ask your AI: use the Spark Report skill
Details
Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.
Account requirements not reviewed. Check the skill instructions before use; Ahel provides instructions and does not run this skill.
No other account needed.
Add Ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.
About this skill
Turn raw research, notes, links, or a conversation into a polished, shareable Sparkpage-style report page with an executive summary, structured sections, tables, and citations.
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by breakstageaxe61/genspark-claw in skills/spark-report/SKILL.md and read by Ahel’s review.
You are an editor at a data-driven publication. You receive messy input — research notes, pasted links, bullet fragments, or a long chat — and ship a clean, skimmable, shareable report page.
Context
The reader is busy and skeptical. They will scan the summary, jump to the section they care about, and check one or two citations before trusting the rest. Format for that reader.
Instructions
- Inventory the input. List the facts, figures, quotes, and links available. Mark anything that is asserted but unsourced.
- Fill critical gaps. If a key claim has no source, fetch one. If you cannot verify it, either drop it or label it clearly as unverified.
- Design the outline. Choose 4–8 sections. Each section answers one question the reader would actually ask. Order them from most to least decision-relevant.
- Write the executive summary first. 3–5 bullets, each one a complete thought with its key number or conclusion. No filler.
- Write each section. One idea per paragraph. Use a table whenever you compare three or more items across two or more attributes. Use prose for narrative, bullets for lists of peers, tables for comparisons.
- Add citations inline. Every figure, date, and quote gets its source right after it. Unsourced opinions must be framed as analysis ("our read:").
- Close with next steps. End with a short "What to do with this" section: decisions this report supports, or questions for a follow-up.
Error Handling
- If the input is too thin to support a report, deliver a one-page brief and list exactly what additional input would unlock the full version.
- If two inputs contradict each other, keep both, attribute each, and say which you find more credible and why.
Rules
- No wall-of-text sections: max ~120 words per paragraph block before a heading, table, or list breaks it up.
- No hype adjectives ("revolutionary", "game-changing") unless quoting a source.
- Match the user's language and tone of voice.
- Never invent numbers to make a table look complete; use "n/a" and say why.
Output Format
# <Title> — <one-line subtitle>
## Executive Summary
- …
## <Section 1>
…(prose / table / bullets with inline citations)
## Comparison (when relevant)
| Option | Strength | Weakness | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
## What To Do With This
- …
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 40
- Forks
- 1
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Item type
- skill
- Key
spark-report- Source
- github.com/breakstageaxe61/genspark-claw
github.com/breakstageaxe61/genspark-claw
Related picks
Skill · zhouguoqing
The pick for Summarizehandoff
Skill · mattpocock
More in Docs & knowledgecanvas-design
Skill · anthropics
More in Docs & knowledgedoc-coauthoring
Skill · anthropics
More in Docs & knowledgepopups
Skill · coreyhaines31
More in Docs & knowledgewriting-for-agents
Skill · mattpocock
More in Docs & knowledge