Validating US Core
SkillDev toolsLets your agent check FHIR health data resources against US Core profiles before sending them to an EHR.
Available today. Use it from your connected AI after setup.
No other account needed.
Connect ahel once, and every AI you use reads what you have installed.
Then ask your AI: use the Validating US Core skill
About this capability
Validate FHIR R4 resources and Bundles against US Core / USCDI profiles with the official HL7 FHIR validator before submitting to an EHR. Covers running validator_cli.jar (or the public validator.fhir.org), declaring meta.profile, must-support elements, common conformance gaps (missing code/category
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by maziyarpanahi/openmed in skills/validating-us-core/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.
Producing syntactically valid R4 (which exporting-to-fhir and
assembling-fhir-bundles do) is not the same as conforming to US Core — the
HL7 US realm profiles that EHRs (Epic, Cerner/Oracle Health) require for
ingestion and that USCDI mandates for certified exchange. This skill validates
OpenMed-produced FHIR against US Core before you submit it.
When to use
Use it as the gate right before submission, after you have assembled a Bundle. Reach for it when the user says "US Core", "USCDI", "must-support", "will Epic accept this", or "validate my FHIR". It is the conformance counterpart to the mechanical builders — OpenMed builds the JSON; the HL7 validator judges it.
Quick start: run the official validator
The reference implementation is the HL7 validator_cli.jar (the same engine
behind https://validator.fhir.org). Validate against the US Core package by IG:
# One-time: get the validator
curl -L -o validator_cli.jar \
https://github.com/hapifhir/org.hl7.fhir.core/releases/latest/download/validator_cli.jar
# Validate a resource/Bundle against the current US Core IG
java -jar validator_cli.jar condition.json \
-version 4.0.1 \
-ig hl7.fhir.us.core \
-tx https://tx.fhir.org # terminology server for code validation
-ig hl7.fhir.us.core pulls the current published US Core package; pin a
version (e.g. -ig hl7.fhir.us.core#6.1.0) for reproducible CI. The validator
exits non-zero on errors and prints issues with FHIRPath locations.
For ad-hoc checks without a JVM, paste the JSON into the public validator UI at https://validator.fhir.org (do not paste real PHI — validate synthetic or de-identified resources only).
Declare the profile you claim
US Core only validates against a profile if the resource claims it via
meta.profile. Add the canonical URL for the profile you target:
{
"resourceType": "Condition",
"meta": {
"profile": [
"http://hl7.org/fhir/us/core/StructureDefinition/us-core-condition-problems-health-concerns"
]
}
}
Then java -jar validator_cli.jar condition.json -ig hl7.fhir.us.core checks it
against that profile's constraints, including must-support elements.
Common conformance gaps (from OpenMed output)
OpenMed NER gives you the clinical mention; US Core wants structured context. The recurring gaps when going from raw spans to US Core:
| Gap | US Core expects | Fix in the exporter |
|---|---|---|
Missing code.coding | A coded value (SNOMED/ICD-10 for Condition; LOINC for Observation; RxNorm for medication) | Ground the span; codeable_concept([...]) with a real coding, not just text |
Missing category | encounter-diagnosis/problem-list-item (Condition), laboratory/vital-signs (Observation) | Set category in the resource shell |
Missing clinicalStatus / status | Required status fields | Set them per the exporting-to-fhir cheat-sheet |
Missing subject | A resolvable Patient reference | Reference an in-Bundle Patient; let to_bundle rewrite it |
Unbound valueQuantity.code | UCUM unit code | Use system: http://unitsofmeasure.org + UCUM code |
| Vital signs not on the vitals profile | us-core-vital-signs shape (LOINC code, vital-signs category) | Use the vitals LOINC + category |
"Must-support" means the producer must populate the element when the data exists. The validator flags must-support omissions as warnings; certified systems may reject them.
Workflow
- Export + assemble the Bundle (
exporting-to-fhir,assembling-fhir-bundles). - Add
meta.profilefor the US Core profile each resource targets. - Run
validator_cli.jarwith-ig hl7.fhir.us.coreand a-txserver. - Read the issues: error = will be rejected; warning = must-support / best practice. Fix errors in the exporter, not by hand-editing JSON.
- Re-validate until clean; wire the validator into CI on synthetic fixtures.
- Submit (
assembling-fhir-bundlesfor the transaction POST).
Turn validator output into an OperationOutcome
If you run validation programmatically, adapt the result into a FHIR
OperationOutcome with OpenMed's helper so the rest of your pipeline speaks one
shape:
from openmed.clinical.exporters.fhir import from_validation_result
# `result` exposes issues, or errors/warnings/information buckets
outcome = from_validation_result(result) # -> R4 OperationOutcome dict
from_validation_result understands either an issues collection or
errors/warnings/information buckets (strings or issue objects) and emits a
clean R4 OperationOutcome (all-ok when empty). It only reads structural
metadata — keep diagnostics PHI-free.
Hand-off to / from OpenMed
- Validate OpenMed-produced FHIR: the input is the Bundle from
assembling-fhir-bundles; the output is conformance issues you fix back inexporting-to-fhir. - OperationOutcome bridge:
from_validation_result/to_operation_outcome/OperationOutcomeIssue(all inopenmed.clinical.exporters.fhir) convert validator findings to R4. - No PHI in validation: validate synthetic or de-identified resources. If a
narrative might carry PHI, run
openmed.interop.fhir_operations.de_identify_bundlefirst.
Edge cases & gotchas
- No
meta.profile, no profile check. The validator validates base R4 only unless the resource claims the profile (or you force it with-profile <url>). - Terminology binding needs a
-txserver. Without-tx, code-system / value-set bindings are not fully checked; many US Corerequiredbindings will be missed. Point-txathttps://tx.fhir.orgor your own Ontoserver. - Pin the IG version in CI (
hl7.fhir.us.core#<version>). US Core revisions change must-support and bindings; an unpinned run drifts. - Reference resolution in Bundles. Validate the whole Bundle so
urn:uuidreferences resolve; validating a lone resource flags references it cannot see. - USCDI ≠ US Core. USCDI is the data-element regulation; US Core is the FHIR profile set that implements it. Conform to the US Core profile for the matching USCDI class.
- Warnings can still block ingestion. Some EHRs reject must-support omissions even though the validator calls them warnings. Treat must-support as required for production.
Standards & references
- US Core Implementation Guide: https://hl7.org/fhir/us/core/
- US Core profiles list: https://hl7.org/fhir/us/core/profiles-and-extensions.html
- USCDI: https://www.healthit.gov/isp/united-states-core-data-interoperability-uscdi
- HL7 FHIR validator (CLI + docs): https://confluence.hl7.org/display/FHIR/Using+the+FHIR+Validator
- Public validator: https://validator.fhir.org
- Public terminology server: https://tx.fhir.org
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 5k
- Forks
- 668
- Last commit
- Sep 2026
Advanced
- Catalog kind
- skill
- Gateway key
validating-us-core- Source
- github.com/maziyarpanahi/openmed