vibe-iteration-review
SkillMonitoring & opsPerforms end-of-iteration review with quality grading, metrics, and trend analysis. Use at the end of each development iteration or sprint.
Use vibe-iteration-review in Claude, ChatGPT or Ahel Desktop
Free. Sign in, add vibe-iteration-review and connect your AI. About a minute.
Also: Claude Code · Cursor · Codex
Then ask your AI: use the vibe-iteration-review skill
Details
Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.
Account requirements not reviewed. Check the skill instructions before use; Ahel provides instructions and does not run this skill.
No other account needed.
Add Ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.
What this skill tells your AI
The instructions your AI receives, as published by ash1794/vibe-engineering in plugins/vibe-engineering/skills/vibe-iteration-review/SKILL.md and read by Ahel’s review.
What gets measured gets improved. Review every iteration.
When to Use This Skill
- End of a development sprint or iteration
- After completing a milestone
- Before starting the next iteration (retrospective)
- When the user asks "how did we do?"
When NOT to Use This Skill
- Mid-iteration (too early, incomplete data)
- After single small tasks
- When there's no defined iteration boundary
Steps
-
Gather data:
- What was planned for this iteration?
- What was actually delivered?
- How many commits? Lines changed? Tests added?
- Coverage delta? Quality metrics?
- Known issues introduced?
-
Grade quality (A-F):
- A: All planned work delivered, tests pass, no known issues, clean code
- B: Most work delivered, minor issues, good test coverage
- C: Core work delivered, some gaps, acceptable quality
- D: Significant gaps, quality issues, needs rework
- F: Iteration failed, major rework needed
-
Compare to previous iterations (if available):
- Is quality trending up or down?
- Is velocity improving?
- Are known issues accumulating?
-
Extract lessons:
- What went well?
- What went poorly?
- What to change next iteration?
Output Format
Iteration Review: [Iteration Name/Number]
Quality Grade: A/B/C/D/F Planned vs Delivered: X/Y (Z%)
| Metric | This Iteration | Previous | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commits | X | Y | ↑/↓/→ |
| Tests added | X | Y | ↑/↓/→ |
| Coverage | X% | Y% | ↑/↓/→ |
| Known issues | X | Y | ↑/↓/→ |
Delivered
- [Task 1]
- [Task 2]
- [Task 3] — deferred because [reason]
Lessons Learned
- [What to continue]
- [What to change]
- [What to stop]
Signals
- GitHub stars
- 162
- Forks
- 40
- Last commit
- Oct 2026
Advanced
- Item type
- skill
- Key
vibe-iteration-review- Source
- github.com/ash1794/vibe-engineering
github.com/ash1794/vibe-engineering
More in Monitoring & ops
Skill · anthropics
More in Monitoring & opsagent-eval
Skill · affaan-m
More in Monitoring & opspricing
Skill · coreyhaines31
More in Monitoring & opslark-okr
Skill · larksuite
More in Monitoring & opsdashboard-builder
Skill · affaan-m
More in Monitoring & opsbabysit
Skill · thedotmack
More in Monitoring & ops