Dev tools skills.
22,476 dev tools skills, including improve-codebase-architecture, tdd and setup-matt-pocock-skills, are listed on Ahel today. Each one has a page of its own that says what it does and whether Ahel can serve it in Claude, Claude Code, ChatGPT, Codex and Cursor.
Category: Dev tools
22,476 results · page 219 of 750
- View details
aistats-supplementarySkillDev tools
Helps your agent prepare AISTATS supplementary material like appendices, proofs, code archives, and extra tables.
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
aistats-topic-selectionSkillDev tools
Helps your agent judge if a research project fits AISTATS and sharpen its statistics framing before writing.
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
aistats-workflowSkillDev tools
Lets your agent plan an AISTATS paper timeline with backward-scheduled deadlines from submission through camera-ready.
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
aistats-writing-styleSkillDev tools
Guides your agent to revise an AISTATS paper for concise framing, clear theorems, and statistically careful wording.
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
ajps-data-analysisSkillDev tools
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for an American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) manuscript. AJPS will have a third-party verifier re-run your exact code against the numerical results in the main text before publication, so analyze reproducibly from the first line. Guides analysis a
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
ajps-literature-positioningSkillDev tools
Use when positioning an American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) manuscript against the literature. AJPS is double-blind, so positioning must engage the relevant debates while keeping the manuscript fully anonymized (third-person self-citation, no first-person "we showed"). Stakes the contributi
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
ajps-rebuttalSkillDev tools
Use when writing the response to an American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) revise-and-resubmit. The revised manuscript stays double-blind, the response memorandum is submitted anonymized, and any new analyses must keep the replication package re-runnable for the third-party verifier at accepta
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
ajps-replication-and-verificationSkillDev tools
Use when building the replication package for an American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) manuscript. AJPS is famous for MANDATORY third-party PRE-publication verification — an independent verifier re-runs your deposited code and confirms it reproduces the numerical results in the main text befo
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
ajps-submissionSkillDev tools
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) via Editorial Manager — submission-type selection, full anonymizing for double-blind review, word/abstract caps, APSA-or-Chicago formatting, the 25-page Supporting Information limit, and human-su
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
ajps-theory-buildingSkillDev tools
Use when building the theoretical argument of an American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) manuscript — whether empirical with explicit mechanisms, formal/game-theoretic, or measurement-driven. AJPS rewards testable theory tightly linked to the empirical strategy, with hypotheses stated before th
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
ajs-data-analysisSkillDev tools
Use when planning or auditing the analysis of an American Journal of Sociology (AJS) manuscript so the evidence credibly supports the theoretical claim. Covers analysis norms, uncertainty, robustness, and triangulation across quantitative, comparative-historical, and ethnographic work. Improves the
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
ajs-literature-positioningSkillDev tools
Use when positioning an American Journal of Sociology (AJS) manuscript within the literature so it reads as in dialogue with current sociology. AJS reviewers are assigned by readers who locate the paper's substantive area and method, and the journal prizes engagement with live theoretical debates. M
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
ajs-rebuttalSkillDev tools
Use when responding to an American Journal of Sociology (AJS) decision — an R&R response letter to multiple double-blind reviewers and the editor, or an author Reply to a published Comment in AJS's Comment-and-Reply tradition. Structures a persuasive, evidence-based response; it does not fabricate r
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
ajs-review-processSkillDev tools
Use to understand how the American Journal of Sociology (AJS) evaluates a manuscript — its distinctive student-run, double-blind review out of the University of Chicago Department of Sociology, the "preject" screen, reviewer assignment by a Manuscript Assignment Board, and decision categories. Sets
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
ajs-submissionSkillDev tools
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for the American Journal of Sociology (AJS) via Editorial Manager — the $30 submission fee (waived for sole-author grad students), the separate cover page for double-blind review, the ~150-word abstract, mandatory figure alt text, AJS house style,
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
ajs-tables-figuresSkillDev tools
Use when building tables and figures for an American Journal of Sociology (AJS) manuscript to AJS house conventions — discrete consecutive numbering, appendix-table lettering, separate exhibit sections after the text, and mandatory alt text for every figure at submission. Prepares exhibits; it does
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
ajs-theory-buildingSkillDev tools
Use when building the theoretical argument of an American Journal of Sociology (AJS) manuscript into a portable, discipline-level contribution. AJS prizes theoretical ambition above a bare finding — explicit concepts, mechanisms, and scope conditions, in the idiom of the work (quantitative, comparat
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
ajs-topic-selectionSkillDev tools
Use when deciding whether a sociology project fits the American Journal of Sociology (AJS) and how to frame it. AJS is the discipline's oldest generalist journal, with a premium on theoretical ambition and dialogue with current sociology; the test is general significance plus a portable theoretical
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
ajs-workflowSkillDev tools
Use as the entry point for any American Journal of Sociology (AJS) manuscript. Routes to the right AJS sub-skill based on where you are in the lifecycle and whether the piece is a research article, a Comment/Reply, or a book-review response. It dispatches; it does not draft content.
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
amann-editor-strategySkillDev tools
Use when working with the Associate Editor and Editor of an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — scope alignment after a proposal is invited, what review-article referees evaluate, and revision expectations. Plans the interaction; it does not run the portal preflight (amann-submission) or
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
amann-organizing-frameworkSkillDev tools
Use when building the novel integrative framework that an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review must deliver — the theory-advancing "new way of seeing the field" that is the acceptance bar, not a catalog of papers. Designs the spine; it does not gather the literature (amann-literature-synthes
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
amann-proposal-framingSkillDev tools
Use when writing the short proposal that gates an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — the ≤5-page, four-heading proposal submitted under the twice-yearly deadlines before any full review is invited. Builds the proposal; it does not gather the literature (amann-literature-synthesis) or run
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
amann-review-processSkillDev tools
Use when planning around the two-step proposal→invited-review process of the Academy of Management Annals (Annals) — the twice-yearly proposal cadence, double-blind proposal review, the editor-only full-review development, and timelines. Explains the process; it does not write the proposal (amann-pr
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
amann-revisionSkillDev tools
Use when responding to an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) proposal decision or full-review referee letter — framework/attitude asks, coverage gaps, balance complaints, and accessibility. Drafts the response letter and revision plan; it does not run the portal preflight (amann-submission) or re
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
amann-submissionSkillDev tools
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) proposal or invited full review via the Manuscript Central portal — proposal-vs-invited-review route, deadlines, formatting, CV, and anonymity. Final checks; it does not draft content.
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
amann-topic-selectionSkillDev tools
Use when judging whether a management/organization literature is an Academy of Management Annals (Annals)-scale review topic — mature, important, fragmented, and integrable into a new framework — rather than a narrow review. Decides fit and frames the review's animating problem; it does not gather t
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
amann-workflowSkillDev tools
Use when deciding which amann-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a comprehensive review article from topic selection through revision for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
amanthro-literature-positioningSkillDev tools
Use when positioning an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript against the literature so it reads as a four-field contribution. AA readers span sociocultural, archaeology, biological, and linguistic anthropology, so the paper must engage the conversations they expect and decenter a US/Anglophone-on
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
amanthro-rebuttalSkillDev tools
Use when writing the response to an American Anthropologist (AA) revise-and-resubmit. AA uses anonymous peer review under an ethics of care, often with cross-subfield reviewers, so the response must convert each reviewer while keeping the editor confident and the ethnographic contribution intact. St
Ready to connect★ 1k
- View details
amanthro-review-processSkillDev tools
Use when you need to understand how American Anthropologist (AA) evaluates a manuscript — editorial screening, anonymous peer review under an ethics of care, the four-field editorial board, decision categories, and how section choice shapes the path. Sets expectations and shapes the paper to survive
Ready to connect★ 1k
Looking for something else?
Dev tools is one category of skills on Ahel. Browse all skills, or open another category above.