skill-native-escalation-routing

SkillSecurity

Use when choosing native or multi-LLM handling for init, review, or security requests

Use skill-native-escalation-routing in Claude, ChatGPT or Ahel Desktop

Free. Sign in, add skill-native-escalation-routing and connect your AI. About a minute.

Also: Claude Code · Cursor · Codex

Then ask your AI: use the skill-native-escalation-routing skill

Details

Instructions available. Your AI can read the instructions. Execution depends on the setup they require.

Add ahel to your AI once: Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Claude Code or Codex. Then ask it to use this.

skill-native-escalation-routingStart free

What this skill tells your AI

The instructions your AI receives, as published by nyldn/claude-octopus in skills/skill-native-escalation-routing/SKILL.md and read by ahel’s review.

Host: Codex CLI — This skill was designed for Claude Code and adapted for Codex. Cross-reference commands use installed skill names in Codex rather than /octo:* slash commands. Use the active Codex shell and subagent tools. Do not claim a provider, model, or host subagent is available until the current session exposes it. For host tool equivalents, see skills/blocks/codex-host-adapter.md.

Native-First Escalation Routing

Use this skill when the user asks for repository initialization, code review, or security review and it is not yet clear whether Claude-native behavior is sufficient or whether Octopus escalation is warranted.

Core Policy

Claude-native first:

  • /init
  • /review
  • /security-review

Octopus for escalation:

  • /octo:review
  • /octo:security
  • /octo:debate
  • /octo:multi

Route to Claude-Native First

Prefer Claude-native behavior when all of the following are true:

  • the request maps directly to init, review, or security review
  • the user did not ask for multiple model opinions
  • the user did not ask for Codex, Antigravity, or another provider explicitly
  • the task does not require adversarial debate, consensus scoring, or external-provider specialization

Examples:

  • "initialize this repo"
  • "review my staged changes"
  • "security review this auth module"

Escalate to Octopus

Escalate when the user asks for or clearly benefits from:

  • multiple model opinions
  • adversarial review
  • debate between providers
  • provider-specific analysis
  • autonomous codegen verification
  • elevated rigor for complex or high-risk work

Examples:

  • "get multiple model opinions on this PR"
  • "have Codex and Antigravity review this architecture"
  • "do an adversarial security review"
  • "verify this AI-generated implementation before merge"

Execution Guidance

  • If Claude-native is sufficient, do not wrap the task in Octopus unnecessarily.
  • If the user explicitly invokes /octo:review or /octo:security, treat that as an escalation request.
  • If the request is ambiguous, prefer Claude-native first and mention Octopus as the escalation path.

Suggested User Framing

Use wording like:

Claude-native first, Octopus for escalation. Use Claude-native /review or /security-review for ordinary requests. Use Octopus when you want multiple model opinions, adversarial review, or stricter multi-LLM workflows.

Signals

GitHub stars
4k
Forks
390
Last commit
Sep 2026
Advanced
Item type
skill
Key
skill-native-escalation-routing-nyldn
Source
github.com/nyldn/claude-octopus