Goal

• Review and criticize the text (markdown, blog posts, documentation)
• Identify mistakes and improvement opportunities, focusing on factual errors, rather than style suggestions
• Propose concrete improvements to content, flow, visual clarity, pacing, and audience fit

Workflow

Read the Material

• Read the text passed by the user carefully

Identify and Rank Mistakes

• Identify mistakes in the passed text

Definition

• Criteria for mistakes:

  • Factual inaccuracy (wrong information, outdated claims)
  • Logical contradiction or inconsistency
  • Technical error (code doesn't work, command is wrong, API is misrepresented)
  • Broken reference (link is dead, file path is wrong, name is misspelled)
  • Only report issues you are absolutely certain about

• Ranking severity:

  • High: Misleads reader or causes confusion
  • Medium: Could improve clarity or accuracy
  • Low: Minor inconsistency or incomplete statement

TODOs

• Ignore the TODOs that already exist in the text

Suggest Improvements

• Identify opportunities to improve clarity, structure, or completeness without changing facts

Definition

• Types of improvements:

  • Clarity: Making text easier to understand
  • Completeness: Adding missing context or examples
  • Consistency: Aligning terminology or formatting
  • Readability: Breaking up dense sections or improving flow

• Ranking severity:

  • High: Significantly improves comprehension or prevents misunderstanding
  • Medium: Moderately improves clarity or adds useful detail
  • Low: Minor improvement in readability or polish

Write the Results

• The output format is a vim cfile following .claude/skills/cfile.rules.md

  <full path file>:<LINE_NUMBER>:1 [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW] Short description of error
  <full path file>:<LINE_NUMBER>:1 [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW] Why this is wrong and what the correct statement should be
  ...
  

• Example

  msml610/lectures_source/README.md:12 [HIGH] Claims "pip install X" but pip package is named "X-lib"
  msml610/lectures_source/README.md:5 [HIGH] Add example of basic usage after the description
  helpers/docs.md:8 [MEDIUM] Link to API docs is outdated (2023 version, current is 2024)
  

• Save this in a file related to the file being processed <DIR>/<FILE>.CRITICIZE.md

  • E.g., msml610/lectures_source/Lesson03.1-Knowledge_representation.txt -> msml610/lectures_source/Lesson03.1-Knowledge_representation.CRITICIZE.txt

Wait for User Approval

• Wait for user to:
  • Select which mistakes and improvements using the index to fix
  • Provide any additional context or corrections
• Once approved, implement the selected changes

Verification

• Confirm the cfile follows .claude/skills/cfile.rules.md
• Confirm every issue has a severity level and a file:line reference
• Confirm the output file <DIR>/<FILE>.CRITICIZE.md was created